Re: RFC: reviewer's statement of oversight

[Jeremy Fitzhardinge]

Randy Dunlap wrote:
> but Tested-by: doesn't have to involve any "actually looking at/reading
> the patch."  Right?
>
> IOW, the patch could be ugly as sin but it works...
>   

Sure, absolutely.  I never said its a substitute for review.  An ugly
working patch is useful, because its the raw material for a nice working
patch.  A nice non-working patch can be framed and admired from a
distance, but it isn't terribly useful.

    J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/