Re: [RFC 0/1][PATCH] POSIX SCHED_SPORADIC implementation for tasksand groups

[Dario Faggioli]

On Mon, 2008-08-11 at 10:17 -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> > Well, a new version of glibc could use those to implement the posix
> > interface. Because as I understand it, glibc can break ABI on certain
> > version bumps.
> 
> In theory.  But this hasn't happened so far and I don't expect it to
> happen any time soon.  New interfaces are not a real problem for me, though.
> 
Ok, we'll see.
I still think that SCHED_SPORADIC task (but specially group!) scheduling
could be useful, even with a non fully-POSIX interface.

This mail only to say that I'm actively working on it, i.e., I'm
rewriting it with the new sched_param2/sched_setscheduler2 interface and
fixing some very glaring bugs that was present in my first code. :-P

Unfortunately, I'll be off the PC till September 4th... If you are still
interested in, we will talk about it at that time, when I'll post the
new version of the RFC.
I also hope, by then, to be able to show you some test cases and
overhead estimation.

Thanks all of you for minding me, and sorry if I wasted some of your
time. :-)

Best Regards,
Dario

-- 
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>>
(Raistlin Majere, DragonLance Chronicles -Dragons of Spring Drawning-)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli
GNU/Linux Registered User: #340657
Web: http://www.linux.it/~raistlin
Blog: http://blog.linux.it/raistlin
SIP Account: dario.faggioli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx or
             raistlin@xxxxxxxxx
Jabber Account: dario.faggioli@xxxxxxxxxx/WengoPhone
GnuPG Key ID: 4DC83AC4
GnuPG Key Fingerprint: 2A78 AD5D B9CF A082 0836 08AD 9385 DA04 4DC8 3AC4

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part