Re: [PATCH 03/15] perf util: Save pid-cmdline mapping into tracingheader
From: Jiri Olsa
Date: Wed May 15 2013 - 17:21:44 EST
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 07:13:47PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@xxxxxxx>
>
> Current trace info data lacks the saved cmdline mapping which is
> needed for pevent to find out the comm of a task. Add this and bump
> up the version number so that perf can determine its presence when
> reading.
>
> This is mostly corresponding to trace.dat file version 6, but still
> lacks 4 byte of number of cpus, and 10 bytes of type string - and I
> think we don't need those anyway.
>
> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> tools/perf/util/trace-event-info.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> tools/perf/util/trace-event-parse.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> tools/perf/util/trace-event-read.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> tools/perf/util/trace-event.h | 1 +
> 4 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/trace-event-info.c b/tools/perf/util/trace-event-info.c
> index bfcaeac7ef9d..c0f364273993 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/trace-event-info.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/trace-event-info.c
> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@
> #include <lk/debugfs.h>
> #include "evsel.h"
>
> -#define VERSION "0.5"
> +#define VERSION "0.6"
>
> static int output_fd;
>
> @@ -390,6 +390,34 @@ out:
> return err;
> }
>
> +static int record_saved_cmdline(void)
> +{
> + unsigned int size;
> + char *path;
> + struct stat st;
> + int ret, err = 0;
> +
> + path = get_tracing_file("saved_cmdlines");
> + if (!path) {
> + pr_debug("can't get tracing/saved_cmdline");
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> +
> + ret = stat(path, &st);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + /* not found */
> + size = 0;
> + if (write(output_fd, &size, 8) != 8)
> + err = -EIO;
> + goto out;
> + }
> + err = record_file(path, 8);
> +
> +out:
> + put_tracing_file(path);
> + return err;
> +}
> +
> static void
> put_tracepoints_path(struct tracepoint_path *tps)
> {
> @@ -546,6 +574,9 @@ struct tracing_data *tracing_data_get(struct list_head *pattrs,
> if (err)
> goto out;
> err = record_ftrace_printk();
> + if (err)
> + goto out;
> + err = record_saved_cmdline();
>
> out:
> /*
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/trace-event-parse.c b/tools/perf/util/trace-event-parse.c
> index fe7a27d67d2b..ef09e4720e04 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/trace-event-parse.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/trace-event-parse.c
> @@ -232,6 +232,23 @@ void parse_ftrace_printk(struct pevent *pevent,
> }
> }
>
> +void parse_saved_cmdline(struct pevent *pevent,
> + char *file, unsigned int size __maybe_unused)
any reason for the size parameter? I can see some other
functions already following this prototype, but I dont
see the reason.. just curious ;)
void parse_ftrace_printk(struct pevent *pevent,
char *file, unsigned int size __maybe_unused)
void parse_proc_kallsyms(struct pevent *pevent,
char *file, unsigned int size __maybe_unused)
jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/