Re: [PATCH v9 03/19] qspinlock: Add pending bit

[Ingo Molnar]

* Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@xxxxxx> wrote:

> Because the qspinlock needs to touch a second cacheline; add a pending
> bit and allow a single in-word spinner before we punt to the second
> cacheline.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@xxxxxx>

This patch should have a "From: Peter" in it as well, right?

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/