Re: [PATCH v9 03/19] qspinlock: Add pending bit

[Waiman Long]

On 04/18/2014 04:13 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 05:20:31PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> > > > +	while ((val = atomic_read(&lock->val))&   _Q_LOCKED_MASK)
> > > > +		arch_mutex_cpu_relax();
> > > That was a cpu_relax().
> > Yes, but arch_mutex_cpu_relax() is the same as cpu_relax() for x86.
> Yeah, so why bother typing more?
>
> Let the s390 people sort that if/when they try and make this work for
> them.

OK, I can revert the change if you wish. I have no objection for that.

-Longman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/