Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci: Set ocr_avail directly based on vmmc

[Tim Kryger]

On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 12:20 AM, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 15 April 2014 19:09, Tim Kryger <tim.kryger@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 1:15 AM, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>>> A few times I have suggested to switch to use the
>>> mmc_regulator_get_supply() API to simplify and consolidate code. Could
>>> you please have a look at that?
>>
>> This function will solve my problem but it also suggests that SDHCI
>> drivers should use the vmmc/vqmmc pointers in the mmc_host struct
>> rather than the ones in the sdhci_host struct.
>>
>> Is this your intent?  Do you want to see the regulator pointers in the
>> sdhci_host struct removed once all drivers are modified to use the
>> mmc_host ones?
>
> Correct. That will consolidate code!
>
> Then if sdhci has some special needs for regulators, let's first see
> if we can adopt the API to handle it, before we decide to put that
> code in sdhci driver.

Sounds good.  Please forget about this patch and consider the new
series instead.

https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/4/17/653
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/