Re: [PATCH] pinctrl-baytrail: fix for irq descriptor conflict on ASUS T100TA

[Adam Williamson]

On Mon, 2014-04-21 at 10:30 -0400, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Jin, Yao <yao.jin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 2014/4/21 14:27, Jin, Yao wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 2014/4/20 23:28, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >>> On Sun, 2014-04-20 at 20:08 +0800, Jin, Yao wrote:
> >>>> For the issue that touch screen doesn't work, could you check power
> >>>> state of LPSS devices? For example:
> >>>>
> >>>> cd /sys/bus/acpi/devices
> >>>> grep -H . */power_state
> >>>>
> >>>> If they are D3cold, it should be the reason why touch screen doesn't
> >>>> work. That's another issue, unrelated to this gpio patch.
> >>>
> >>> The touch screen worked fine with kernel 3.14, and Benjamin looked at
> >>> debug output from the attempt to load the touchscreen driver when
> >>> diagnosing the problem, he's not just guessing. I am building a kernel
> >>> without your patch to confirm that fixes it.
> >>>
> >>
> >> I tried the clean kernel 3.14 with the boot option "nomodeset text" on
> >> Dell Venue 11 Pro (If without "nomodeset",my ubuntu is being "black
> >> screen", but that should be another i915 issue).
> >>
> >> After system starup, I executed the "startx" to launch the xwindow. In
> >> xwindow, the touchscreen work.
> >>
> >> I tried the kernel 3.14 again with my gpio patch applied, the result was
> >> the same, the touchscreen work.
> >>
> >> I also check the DSDT table of Dell Venue 11 Pro by searching the
> >> keyword "Interrupt", I can't find any clue for the irq conflict.
> >>
> >> I'm sorry I don't have a Dell Venue 8 for testing, but I guess it's
> >> similar to Dell Venue 11 Pro.
> 
> Sorry, my bad. Actually, this patch does not break the touchscreen,
> but the other Adam applied does:
> https://github.com/AdamWill/baytrail-m/blob/master/kernel/baytrail_gpio_quirk.patch
> 
> This one was to enable wifi, but it actually breaks the touchscreen.
> I'll try to figure out which part of the patch breaks the touchscreen.
> 
> The good point is that I have a reproducer now on the Lenovo Miix 2,
> so I'll be able to spot the pb easily.
> 
> Sorry for having been rude, and thanks for the tests.

Well, I can't actually concur. See my results in
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68291#c44 .

1. A kernel with neither patch applied (and no hid-rmi driver) results
in a working touchscreen.
2. A kernel with only v3 of Doug's patch from
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67921 results in a working
touchscreen.
3. A kernel with both v3 of Doug's patch and this IRQ descriptor
conflict "fix" results in a broken touchscreen.

Seems to me there really is some kind of problem with this patch...
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/