Re: [PATCH RFC] sched: deferred set priority (dprio)

[Mike Galbraith]

On Sun, 2014-08-10 at 05:13 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: 
> On Sat, 2014-08-09 at 20:04 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: 
> > > NAK.  There it is, my imaginary NAK to imaginary realtime priorities :)
> > 
> > Ok, but do you have any alternative proposal yourself how to solve the
> > lockholder preemption problem? I assume you agree it's a real problem.
> > 
> > Just being negative is not very constructive.
> 
> I both acknowledged the problem problem, and made alternative
> suggestions.

Note who I replied to

https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/7/28/77

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/