RE: [PATCH 0/4] irqchip: gic-v2m: Rework GICv2m Initialization

From: Suthikulpanit, Suravee
Date: Mon Aug 11 2014 - 09:31:21 EST


Marc,

Jason already created a branch irqchip/gic-v2m, which I have created my patch against. So, what branch do you want me to re-create a patch against for you to review?

Suravee

-----Original Message-----
From: Marc Zyngier [mailto:marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2014 3:12 AM
To: Suthikulpanit, Suravee
Cc: Mark Rutland; jason@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Pawel Moll; Catalin Marinas; Will Deacon; tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Kasiviswanathan, Harish; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] irqchip: gic-v2m: Rework GICv2m Initialization

Hi Suravee,

On 09/08/14 00:17, suravee.suthikulpanit@xxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@xxxxxxx>
>
> This patch set reworks the GICv2m initialization based on Marc Zyngier
> review comments.
>
> * Rebase to git://git.infradead.org/users/jcooper/linux.git
> irqchip/gic-v2m
>
> Suravee Suthikulpanit (1):
> irqchip/gic-v2m: Restructure the initalization code for v2m
>
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt | 37 +++++++--
> drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v2m.c | 115 +++++++++-----------------
> drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c | 30 +++----
> drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.h | 10 +--
> 4 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 101 deletions(-)
>

While I appreciate that you're trying to reduce the amount of stuff we review, it is actually much easier to look at the patch series as a whole, rather then as a diff against the previous version.

Please squash this into your original series and repost it with a log of what has changed in the cover letter.

Thanks,

M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/