Re: [PATCH v2] fs-fat: Less function calls in fat_fill_super() after error detection

[Dan Carpenter]

On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 04:30:44PM +0100, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> > Meanwhile Markus's error labels are absolutely useless.  They give no
> > indication of what going to the label does.
> 
> Which names would be better acceptable for you?

You named it after the goto location but the label name should be based
on the label location to say what the goto does.  Something like
"err_put_fsinfo", "err_put_fat", and "err_unload" or like that.

regards,
dan carpenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/