Re: [PATCH v2] fs-fat: Less function calls in fat_fill_super() after error detection

[SF Markus Elfring]

>> Which names would be better acceptable for you?
> 
> You named it after the goto location but the label name should be based
> on the label location to say what the goto does.

I find it easier occasionally to name a label similarly to the jump target.
It seems that there are a few variations used for the affected identifiers.


> Something like "err_put_fsinfo", "err_put_fat", and "err_unload" or like that.

How do you think about to provide a patch with your preferred names
if my chances are lower to suggest the pleasing ones directly in my
first tries?

Regards,
Markus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/