Re: Final per cpu consistency patch for -next or late in 3.19 merge period

[Christoph Lameter]

On Tue, 2 Dec 2014, Tejun Heo wrote:

> Sure, I just wanna make sure we don't have dangling references to
> __get_cpu_var() which no longer exists.  There are also a couple
> places where comment text refers to it.  Let's please take care of
> them too.

Here is the ia64 patch:


From: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: ia64: Update comment that references __get_cpu_var

__get_cpu_var was removed. Update the comments.

Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>

Index: linux/arch/ia64/include/asm/percpu.h
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/arch/ia64/include/asm/percpu.h
+++ linux/arch/ia64/include/asm/percpu.h
@@ -35,8 +35,8 @@ extern void *per_cpu_init(void);

 /*
  * Be extremely careful when taking the address of this variable!  Due to virtual
- * remapping, it is different from the canonical address returned by __get_cpu_var(var)!
- * On the positive side, using __ia64_per_cpu_var() instead of __get_cpu_var() is slightly
+ * remapping, it is different from the canonical address returned by this_cpu_ptr(&var)!
+ * On the positive side, using __ia64_per_cpu_var() instead of this_cpu_ptr() is slightly
  * more efficient.
  */
 #define __ia64_per_cpu_var(var) (*({					\
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/