Re: [PATCH 3/3] selftests/kcmp: Always try to build the test
From: Shuah Khan
Date: Tue Dec 02 2014 - 15:59:52 EST
On 12/02/2014 09:20 AM, Christopher Covington wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> On 12/02/2014 12:52 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> Don't prevent the test building on non-x86. Just try and build it and
>> let the chips fall where they may.
>>
>> Add support for CROSS_COMPILE while we're at it. Also we don't need a
>> custom rule for building kcmp_test.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> For what it's worth, all three patches look good to me.
>
> Reviewed-by: Christopher Covington <cov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Thanks,
> Chris
>
All three patches queued for 3.19 - linux-kselftest.git/ fixes branch
kcmp fails on couple tests it runs when CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE
is disabled. However, it isn't bad enough to not include the patch,
especially when there is use for it on arm.
FAIL: 0 expected but -1 returned (Function not implemented)
FAIL: 0 expected but -1 returned (Function not implemented)
-- Shuah
--
Shuah Khan
Sr. Linux Kernel Developer
Samsung Research America (Silicon Valley)
shuahkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | (970) 217-8978
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/