RE: [PATCHv2 0/4] LS1021A: Add dcfb framebuffer driver support.
From: Li.Xiubo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu Dec 04 2014 - 03:30:16 EST
Hi Tomi,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tomi Valkeinen [mailto:tomi.valkeinen@xxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 4:10 PM
> To: Xiubo Li-B47053; Arnd Bergmann
> Cc: plagnioj@xxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-fbdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; shawn.guo@xxxxxxxxxx; alexander.stein@systec-
> electronic.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/4] LS1021A: Add dcfb framebuffer driver support.
>
> Hi Xiubo,
>
> On 04/12/14 03:56, Li.Xiubo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > Hi Arnd,
> >
> > Thanks for you advice.
> >
> > Because this is very emergency for customers and have delayed for monthes,
> and the
> > DRM/KMS will have a little long time to be supported. So I'd like to add
> this first
> > and will add DRM/KMS version later.
>
> I would also suggest to just write a drm driver for this. I don't see
> anything special in this driver that would be better supported via
> fbdev. With drm you'll get a more modern framework, and you will still
> have the same /dev/fbX device to use for legacy userspace software.
>
> What do you mean with "delayed for months"? The first version of this
> series (that I can find) was posted less than two weeks ago.
>
Sorry for confusing, it was delayed for other reasons internal.
I am not familiar about the DRM, and I'd like to know if the DRM driver will be
support, should I also develop the libdrm too ? Or just coding in kernel level ?
Is there any Document about how to have /dev/fbX device to use ?
If possible, I'd like this could be accept for this time. And I will add the DRM
Version later(for developing and testing will take a long time).
Thanks very much,
BRs
Xiubo
> Tomi
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/