Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] net-PPP: Replacement of a printk() call by pr_warn() in mppe_rekey()

[terry white]

... ciao:

: on "12-4-2014" "Joe Perches" writ:
: > Does it make sense to express such implementation details in the Linux 
: > coding style documentation more explicitly (besides the fact that this 
: > update suggestion was also triggered by a warning from the script 
: > "checkpatch.pl".
: 
: Probably not.
: 
: Overly formalized coding style rules are perhaps
: more of a barrier to entry than most want.
 
   funny you should mention that.  as nothing more than a casual observer, 
i'm noticing a "TIRED" sensation reading this thread.  i have "0" 
confidence a "SERIOUS" participant's enthusiasm would remain untested.
 
   however, the "checkpatch.pl" warning suggests an assumed 'custom'. i 
can't tell if this a 'serious' issue, or "pickin' fly shit out of pepper".
 
   but from my reading of it, the "CODE" , and the "logic" driving it, is 
not the problem.

    season's best ...

-- 
... it's not what you see ,
    but in stead , notice ...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/