Hi Yakir,
Am Montag, 24. August 2015, 20:48:01 schrieb Yakir Yang:
å 08/24/2015 12:20 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski åé:In a generic driver, the property should have either none, or the analogix
On 24.08.2015 11:42, Yakir Yang wrote:Okay, I got your means. So document is not the focus, the most important
Hi Krzysztof,That is one of ways how to do this. However more important is that
å 08/23/2015 07:43 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski åé:
2015-08-24 8:23 GMT+09:00 Rob Herring <robherring2@xxxxxxxxx>:Sorry about this one, actually I have add Exynos maintainers in version
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 9:50 AM, Yakir Yang <ykk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:No, there is no agreement. This wasn't even sent to Exynos maintainers.
Analogix dp driver is split from exynos dp driver, so we justYou can't just change the exynos bindings and break compatibility. Is
make an copy of exynos_dp.txt, and then simplify exynos_dp.txt
Beside update some exynos dtsi file with the latest change
according to the devicetree binding documents.
there some agreement with exynos folks to do this?
1 & version 2,
but lose some maintainers in version 3, I would fix it in bellow
versions.
Additionally the patchset did not look interesting to me because ofDo you mean that I should keep the old properties declare in
misleading subject - Documentation instead of "ARM: dts:".
Yakir, please:
1. Provide backward compatibility. Mark old properties as deprecated
but still support them.
exynos-dp.txt,
but just mark them as deprecated flag.
driver should still support old bindings so such code:
- if (of_property_read_u32(dp_node, "samsung,color-space",
+ if (of_property_read_u32(dp_node, "analogix,color-space",
is probably wrong. Will the driver support old DTB in the same way as it
was supporting before the change?
is that
driver should support the old dts prop. If so the new analogix dp driver
should keep
the "samsung,color-space", rather then just mark it with [DEPRECATED] flag.
But from your follow suggest, I think you agree to update driver code,
and just mark
old prop with deprecated flag. If so I think such code would not be wrong
- if (of_property_read_u32(dp_node, "samsung,color-space",
+ if (of_property_read_u32(dp_node, "analogix,color-space",
prefix. But DT-properties need to be backwards compatible, meaning an older
Exynos devicetree should run unmodified with a newer kernel.
So the common course of action is to mark the old one as deprecated but still
test for both, so something like:
if (of_property_read_u32(dp_node, "analogix,color-space",
&dp_video_config->color_space))
if (of_property_read_u32(dp_node, "samsung,color-space",
&dp_video_config->color_space)) {
dev_err(dev, "failed to get color-space\n");
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
}