RE: [PATCH 2/2] f2fs: fix to release inode correctly
From: Chao Yu
Date: Mon Aug 24 2015 - 21:41:12 EST
Hi Jaegeuk,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaegeuk@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2015 12:54 AM
> To: Chao Yu
> Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] f2fs: fix to release inode correctly
>
[snip]
> > + * if we skip truncate_node in remove_inode_page bacause we failed
> > + * before, it's better to find another way to release resource of
> > + * this inode (e.g. valid block count, node block or nid). Here we
> > + * choose to add this inode to orphan list, so that we can call iput
> > + * for releasing in orphan recovery flow.
> > + *
> > + * Note: we should add inode to orphan list before f2fs_unlock_op()
> > + * so we can prevent losing this orphan when encoutering checkpoint
> > + * and following suddenly power-off.
> > + */
> > + if (err && err != -ENOENT) {
> > + err = acquire_orphan_inode(sbi);
> > + if (!err)
> > + add_orphan_inode(sbi, inode->i_ino);
>
> Need this too?
>
> if (err)
> set_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_NEED_FSCK);
We have another chance to release inode resource in following path:
- handle_failed_inode
- iput
- f2fs_evict_inode
- f2fs_truncate
- remove_inode_page
So I choose to set SBI_NEED_FSCK in the end of f2fs_evict_inode.
Thanks,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/