Re: Regression in intel_powerclamp, due to cpu whitelist removal

From: Jacob Pan
Date: Wed Oct 19 2016 - 23:44:18 EST


On Tue, 18 Oct 2016 14:20:49 +0000
Alok Kataria <akataria@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi Jacob, Zhang,
>
> One of your recent commit "thermal/powerclamp: remove cpu
> whitelistâ [1], has caused a regression in the kernel.
>
> That commit changed powerclamp_probe from requiring all of the
> following features:
>
> X86_FEATURE_NONSTOP_TSC
> X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC
> X86_FEATURE_MWAIT
> X86_FEATURE_ARAT
>
> to *any* of them. The problem is clamp_thread still wants to use
> mwait_idle_with_hints even if the CPU doesn't support it.
>
Hi Alok,

You are right, it should be AND not OR.

+Eric who has a patch to address this.

https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9365005/

Rui/Rafael,

Could you consider this as an urgent fix?

Jacob
> This was reported by our users when running ubuntu 16.10
> (4.8.0-22-generic) inside a VMware VM, though as mentioned above I
> donât think it is specific to our platform. We have seen kernel
> panics due to invalid opcode because of this. Below is the stack
> trace for your reference.
>
> [ 5.736416] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP
> [ 5.736455] Modules linked in: vmw_vsock_vmci_transport vsock
> vmw_balloon intel_powerclamp coretemp crct10dif_pclmul crc32_pclmul
> ghash_clmulni_intel aesni_intel aes_x86_64 lrw glue_helper
> ablk_helper cryptd intel_rapl_perf input_leds joydev serio_raw
> snd_ens1371 snd_ac97_codec gameport ac97_bus snd_pcm snd_seq_midi
> snd_seq_midi_event snd_rawmidi snd_seq snd_seq_device snd_timer snd
> soundcore i2c_piix4 shpchp vmw_vmci nfit floppy(+) mac_hid parport_pc
> ppdev lp parport ip_tables x_tables autofs4 hid_generic usbhid hid
> ahci libahci e1000 mptspi mptscsih psmouse mptbase vmwgfx
> scsi_transport_spi ttm drm_kms_helper syscopyarea sysfillrect
> sysimgblt fb_sys_fops drm pata_acpi fjes [ 5.744370] CPU: 1 PID:
> 912 Comm: kidle_inject/1 Not tainted 4.8.0-22-generic #24-Ubuntu
> [ 5.744373] Hardware name: VMware, Inc. VMware Virtual
> Platform/440BX Desktop Reference Platform, BIOS 6.00 07/02/2015
> [ 5.744375] task: ffff9658f7a663c0 task.stack: ffff9658fa908000
> [ 5.744378] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffc05728b8>] [<ffffffffc05728b8>]
> clamp_thread+0x2b8/0x5d0 [intel_powerclamp] [ 5.744380] RSP:
> 0018:ffff9658fa90be00 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 5.744383] RAX:
> ffff9658fa908008 RBX: 00000000fffee0a6 RCX: 0000000000000000
> [ 5.744386] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000246 RDI:
> 0000000000000246 [ 5.744388] RBP: ffff9658fa90bec0 R08:
> ffff9658fa908000 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 5.744391] R10:
> 000000000001cbf7 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffffffff8db581a0
> [ 5.744393] R13: ffff9658fa908000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15:
> ffff9658fa908000 [ 5.744396] FS: 0000000000000000(0000)
> GS:ffff9658fc640000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 5.744398] CS:
> 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 5.744401] CR2:
> 00007ffa6cc262e8 CR3: 000000003ab3b000 CR4: 00000000001406e0
> [ 5.744403] Stack: [ 5.744406] 0000000000000001
> ffff9658f7a66dc0 ffff9658fc659200 00000000e878d638 [ 5.744409]
> 0000000000000001 00000002fc659200 0000000000000001 ffff9658fa908008
> [ 5.744411] 0000000000000000 ffff9658fc64fea8 00000000fffee0a6
> ffffffffc05720a0 [ 5.744414] Call Trace: [ 5.744416]
> [<ffffffffc05720a0>] ? pkg_state_counter+0xa0/0xa0 [intel_powerclamp]
> [ 5.744419] [<ffffffffc0572600>] ?
> powerclamp_set_cur_state+0x170/0x170 [intel_powerclamp]
> [ 5.744421] [<ffffffffc0572600>] ?
> powerclamp_set_cur_state+0x170/0x170 [intel_powerclamp]
> [ 5.744424] [<ffffffff8cca3c18>] kthread+0xd8/0xf0
> [ 5.744427] [<ffffffff8d49f29f>] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x40
> [ 5.744429] [<ffffffff8cca3b40>] ?
> kthread_create_on_node+0x1e0/0x1e0 [ 5.744432] Code: cc e9 ba 00
> 00 00 eb 19 0f 1f 00 0f ae f0 65 48 8b 04 25 04 69 01 00 0f ae b8 08
> c0 ff ff 0f ae f0 31 d2 48 8b 44 24 38 48 89 d1 <0f> 01 c8 49 8b 45
> 08 a8 08 75 0b b9 01 00 00 00 4c 89 f0 0f 01 [ 5.744434] RIP
> [<ffffffffc05728b8>] clamp_thread+0x2b8/0x5d0 [intel_powerclamp]
> [ 5.744437] RSP <ffff9658fa90be00> [ 5.744440] invalid opcode:
> 0000 [#2] SMP [ 5.744452] ---[ end trace cf659c4076bf2804 ]---
>
> Looking at the instruction at the RIP <ffffffffc05728b8> shows that
> the kernel attempted to execute âmonitorâ instruction.
>
> 8b8: 0f 01 c8 monitor %rax,%rcx,%rdx
> 8bb: 49 8b 45 08 mov 0x8(%r13),%rax
>
> To fix this, I think you should restore the explicit feature check
> âif blockâ that was removed in the above mentioned commit. Can you
> please look at this ?
>
> Thanks,
> Alok
>
>
> [1] b721ca0d192754deccb89fb01c77e41e6fd91ad9
> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/b721ca0d192754deccb89fb01c77e41e6fd91ad9,
>

[Jacob Pan]