Re: [PATCH 0/4] fujitsu_init() cleanup

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 8:21 AM, MichaÅ KÄpieÅ <kernel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 04:13:40PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> > On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 4:06 PM, MichaÅ KÄpieÅ <kernel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > > Darren, Andy,
>> > >
>> > > Please drop this patch series for now.  I will send a rebased v2 after a
>> > > long overdue patch series from Alan Jenkins gets applied in a reworked
>> > > form.
>> >
>> > Noted.
>> >
>> > Just for you information. Our repo now consists three branches: fixes,
>> > for-next, and testing. testing is kinda for internal use, it might be
>> > broken or be in a wrong state.
>> > Better to use for-next as a base. For this cycle (which is my first as
>>
>> In general, you should be able to use Linus' master as the base. Only if you
>> require patches already in for-next, should you use for-next.
>
> Thanks, guys, this is all helpful information.  I have always assumed
> testing was the correct base branch because my patches got pushed there
> once they got accepted.

Consider testing as a purgatory of the stuff.

P.S. Darren fixed your name in previous patches and thus one more
rebase happened in for-next.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko