Re: [PATCH 0/4] fujitsu_init() cleanup

[MichaÅ KÄpieÅ]

> On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 04:13:40PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 4:06 PM, MichaÅ KÄpieÅ <kernel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Darren, Andy,
> > >
> > > Please drop this patch series for now.  I will send a rebased v2 after a
> > > long overdue patch series from Alan Jenkins gets applied in a reworked
> > > form.
> > 
> > Noted.
> > 
> > Just for you information. Our repo now consists three branches: fixes,
> > for-next, and testing. testing is kinda for internal use, it might be
> > broken or be in a wrong state.
> > Better to use for-next as a base. For this cycle (which is my first as
> 
> In general, you should be able to use Linus' master as the base. Only if you
> require patches already in for-next, should you use for-next.

Thanks, guys, this is all helpful information.  I have always assumed
testing was the correct base branch because my patches got pushed there
once they got accepted.

-- 
Best regards,
MichaÅ KÄpieÅ