Re: [PATCH 4/4] cpu_cooling: Drop static-power related stuff

From: Viresh Kumar
Date: Wed Nov 22 2017 - 06:08:39 EST

On 22-11-17, 06:55, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 21-11-17, 18:00, Javi Merino wrote:
> > As Ionela pointed out earlier in the thread, the cpufreq driver for Juno
> > was not acceptable for mainline because it used platform specific code.
> Can we get a link to that thread? I don't remember what I have commented earlier
> but the above doesn't seem to be entirely true.
> The basic idea is to use as much common stuff as possible and so to use
> cpufreq-dt.c if possible. Its not that we are against platform specific bits,
> they are fine if they are really required.

Just to correct everyone here, Juno doesn't use the cpufreq-dt driver but
scpi-cpufreq.c :)