Re: [RFC PATCH] usb: hcd: complete URBs in threaded-IRQ context instead of tasklet
From: Alan Stern
Date: Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:29:10 EST
On Fri, 16 Feb 2018, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> I've been going over Frederic's softirq patches and it seems that there
> were two problems. One was network related, the other was Mauro's USB
> dvb-[stc] device which was not able to stream properly over time.
>
> Here is an attempt to let the URB complete in the threaded handler
> instead of going to the tasklet. In case the system is SMP then the
> patch [0] would be required in order to have the IRQ and its thread on
> the same CPU.
>
> Mauro, would you mind giving it a shot?
>
> [0] genirq: Let irq thread follow the effective hard irq affinity
> https://git.kernel.org/tip/cbf8699996a6e7f2f674b3a2a4cef9f666ff613e
>
> ---
>
> The urb->complete callback was initially invoked in IRQ context after
> the HCD dropped its lock because the callback could re-queue the URB
> again. Later this completion was deferred to the tasklet allowing the
> HCD hold the lock. Also the BH handler can be interrupted by the IRQ
> handler adding more "completed" requests to its queue.
> While this batching is good in general, the softirq defers its doing for
> short period of time if it is running constantly without a break. This
> breaks some use cases where constant USB throughput is required.
> As an alternative approach to tasklet handling, I defer the URB
> completion to the HCD's threaded handler. There are two lists for
> "high-prio" proccessing and lower priority (to mimic current behaviour).
> The URBs in the high-priority list are always preffered over the URBs
> in the low-priority list.
We originally used tasklets because we didn't want to incur the delays
associated with running in a process context. It seems odd to be
reversing that decision now.
> The URBs from the root-hub never create an interrupt so I currently
> process them in a workqueue (I'm not sure if an URB-enqueue in the
> completion handler would break something).
It worked okay before we changed over to using tasklets.
Alan Stern