Hi,right, they are not related, and i should add the level irq case after that series merged :)
2018-02-13 19:25 GMT+01:00 Brian Norris <briannorris@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
Hi Enric,
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 11:40:44AM +0100, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
On 12/02/18 23:13, Brian Norris wrote:[...]
On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 07:09:05PM +0800, Jeffy Chen wrote:
Add support for specifying event actions to trigger wakeup when using
the gpio-keys input device as a wakeup source.
This would allow the device to configure when to wakeup the system. For
example a gpio-keys input device for pen insert, may only want to wakeup
the system when ejecting the pen.
Suggested-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Changes in v2:
Specify wakeup event action instead of irq trigger type as Brian
suggested.
Not sure if you were aware but there is also some discussion related to this,
maybe we can join the efforts?
v1: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10208261/
v2: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10211147/
Thanks for the pointers. IIUC, that's talking about a different problem:
how to utilize a GPIO key in level-triggered mode. That touches similar
code, but it doesn't really have anything to do with configuring a
different wakeup trigger type.
Right, sorry. I see now what you are doing.
The two patches would need to be reconciled, if they both are going to
be merged. But otherwise, I think they're perfectly fine to be separate.
Yes, that's why I got confused, I had those patches applied on my tree
and when I tried to apply these failed and I wrongly assumed that were
doing the same. Waiting to test the third version ;)
Thanks,
Enric
Brian