Re: linux-next: manual merge of the powerpc tree with the m68k tree
From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Wed Aug 01 2018 - 19:42:05 EST
Hi all,
[forgot the conflict resolution ...]
On Thu, 2 Aug 2018 09:27:20 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the powerpc tree got a conflict in:
>
> arch/m68k/mac/misc.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 5b9bfb8ec467 ("m68k: mac: Use time64_t in RTC handling")
>
> from the m68k tree and commit:
>
> ebd722275f9c ("macintosh/via-pmu: Replace via-pmu68k driver with via-pmu driver")
>
> from the powerpc tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
diff --cc arch/m68k/mac/misc.c
index 19e9d8eef1f2,28090a44fa09..3534aa6a4dc2
--- a/arch/m68k/mac/misc.c
+++ b/arch/m68k/mac/misc.c
@@@ -90,11 -85,11 +90,11 @@@ static void cuda_write_pram(int offset
}
#endif /* CONFIG_ADB_CUDA */
- #ifdef CONFIG_ADB_PMU68K
+ #ifdef CONFIG_ADB_PMU
-static long pmu_read_time(void)
+static time64_t pmu_read_time(void)
{
struct adb_request req;
- long time;
+ time64_t time;
if (pmu_request(&req, NULL, 1, PMU_READ_RTC) < 0)
return 0;
Attachment:
pgpQAxhJxUtOL.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature