Re: [PATCH 09/46] dmaengine: cppi41: use dmaenginem_async_device_register to simplify the code
From: Huang Shijie
Date: Sun Aug 05 2018 - 23:29:03 EST
On Fri, Aug 03, 2018 at 10:55:25AM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>
>
> On 2018-08-03 10:19, Huang Shijie wrote:
> > Use dmaenginem_async_device_register to simplify the code:
> > remove dma_async_device_unregister
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Huang Shijie <sjhuang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/dma/ti/cppi41.c | 7 ++-----
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/dma/ti/cppi41.c b/drivers/dma/ti/cppi41.c
> > index 1497da367710..d2998a19ed2e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/dma/ti/cppi41.c
> > +++ b/drivers/dma/ti/cppi41.c
> > @@ -1096,21 +1096,19 @@ static int cppi41_dma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > goto err_chans;
> > cdd->irq = irq;
> >
> > - ret = dma_async_device_register(&cdd->ddev);
> > + ret = dmaenginem_async_device_register(&cdd->ddev);
> > if (ret)
> > goto err_chans;
> >
> > ret = of_dma_controller_register(dev->of_node,
> > cppi41_dma_xlate, &cpp41_dma_info);
> > if (ret)
> > - goto err_of;
> > + goto err_chans;
> >
> > pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(dev);
> > pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(dev);
> >
> > return 0;
> > -err_of:
> > - dma_async_device_unregister(&cdd->ddev);
> > err_chans:
> > deinit_cppi41(dev, cdd);
> > err_init_cppi:
> > @@ -1132,7 +1130,6 @@ static int cppi41_dma_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > dev_err(&pdev->dev, "%s could not pm_runtime_get: %i\n",
> > __func__, error);
> > of_dma_controller_free(pdev->dev.of_node);
> > - dma_async_device_unregister(&cdd->ddev);
>
> If I read the code right then this is not safe.
I read the code again, and find it is okay.
> We would have deinitalized cppi41 driver which is not functional, but we
> will still have the dma device registered and if a channel is requested
> we will have kernel crash.
We cannot succeed to request a channel when the drv->remove() is called.
Please see __device_release_driver:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
if (dev->bus && dev->bus->remove)
dev->bus->remove(dev);
else if (drv->remove)
drv->remove(dev);
device_links_driver_cleanup(dev);
dma_deconfigure(dev);
devres_release_all(dev); ============> Devres release
---------------------------------------------------------------------
For the DMA engine driver, there is only one case which will calls drv->remove():
Use the rmmod(or modprobe -r).
We do not use the device_link_add API for DMA engines.
And we not manually call the device_release_driver() for DMA engines.
But when we use the rmmod, the module state will be MODULE_STATE_GOING.
In the find_candidate(), dma_chan_get() will fail.
And we cannot get a channel.
Please correct me if I am wrong :)
Thanks
Huang Shijie