[PATCH 1/2] mtd: nand: fsl-ifc: check result of SRAM initialization

From: Kurt Kanzenbach
Date: Mon Aug 06 2018 - 05:22:19 EST


The SRAM initialization might fail. If that happens further NAND operations
won't be successful. Therefore, the chip init routine should fail if the SRAM
initialization didn't work.

Signed-off-by: Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/fsl_ifc_nand.c | 17 +++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/fsl_ifc_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/fsl_ifc_nand.c
index 24f59d0066af..e4f5792dc589 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/fsl_ifc_nand.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/fsl_ifc_nand.c
@@ -761,7 +761,7 @@ static const struct nand_controller_ops fsl_ifc_controller_ops = {
.attach_chip = fsl_ifc_attach_chip,
};

-static void fsl_ifc_sram_init(struct fsl_ifc_mtd *priv)
+static int fsl_ifc_sram_init(struct fsl_ifc_mtd *priv)
{
struct fsl_ifc_ctrl *ctrl = priv->ctrl;
struct fsl_ifc_runtime __iomem *ifc_runtime = ctrl->rregs;
@@ -805,12 +805,16 @@ static void fsl_ifc_sram_init(struct fsl_ifc_mtd *priv)
wait_event_timeout(ctrl->nand_wait, ctrl->nand_stat,
msecs_to_jiffies(IFC_TIMEOUT_MSECS));

- if (ctrl->nand_stat != IFC_NAND_EVTER_STAT_OPC)
+ if (ctrl->nand_stat != IFC_NAND_EVTER_STAT_OPC) {
pr_err("fsl-ifc: Failed to Initialise SRAM\n");
+ return -ETIMEDOUT;
+ }

/* Restore CSOR and CSOR_ext */
ifc_out32(csor, &ifc_global->csor_cs[cs].csor);
ifc_out32(csor_ext, &ifc_global->csor_cs[cs].csor_ext);
+
+ return 0;
}

static int fsl_ifc_chip_init(struct fsl_ifc_mtd *priv)
@@ -914,8 +918,13 @@ static int fsl_ifc_chip_init(struct fsl_ifc_mtd *priv)
chip->ecc.algo = NAND_ECC_HAMMING;
}

- if (ctrl->version >= FSL_IFC_VERSION_1_1_0)
- fsl_ifc_sram_init(priv);
+ if (ctrl->version >= FSL_IFC_VERSION_1_1_0) {
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = fsl_ifc_sram_init(priv);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ }

/*
* As IFC version 2.0.0 has 16KB of internal SRAM as compared to older
--
2.11.0