Re: dimlib: should it really be enabled by default? [Was: [PATCH] trivial: lib/Kconfig: typo modertion -> moderation]

[Tal Gilboa]

On 9/20/2019 12:07 AM, Uwe Kleine-KÃnig wrote:
> On 9/19/19 11:03 PM, Uwe Kleine-KÃnig wrote:
>> Fixes: 4f75da3666c0 ("linux/dim: Move implementation to .c files")
>> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-KÃnig <uwe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>   lib/Kconfig | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/lib/Kconfig b/lib/Kconfig
>> index 4e6b1c3e4c98..cc04124ed8f7 100644
>> --- a/lib/Kconfig
>> +++ b/lib/Kconfig
>> @@ -559,7 +559,7 @@ config DIMLIB
>>   	default y
> 
> BTW, I wonder about this "default y". I see there are some drivers that
> select DIMLIB, so I wonder if I benefit from it at all if I don't use
> such a driver?!

Thanks for bringing this up. The only benefit from DIM comes from a 
driver that use it. I don't mind the default would be changed but from 
what I see not all drivers that use DIM have the select DIMLIB line in 
their Kconfig files, so such a change should make sure no functionality 
is broken.

> 
> Best regards
> Uwe