Re: [PATCH 3.16 000/132] 3.16.74-rc1 review
From: Ben Hutchings
Date: Sun Sep 22 2019 - 12:33:35 EST
On Fri, 2019-09-20 at 18:35 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 9/20/19 2:16 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Fri, 2019-09-20 at 13:04 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 03:23:34PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.16.74 release.
> > > > There are 132 patches in this series, which will be posted as responses
> > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > > let me know.
> > > >
> > > > Responses should be made by Mon Sep 23 20:00:00 UTC 2019.
> > > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Build results:
> > > total: 136 pass: 135 fail: 1
> > > Failed builds:
> > > arm:allmodconfig
> > > Qemu test results:
> > > total: 229 pass: 229 fail: 0
> > >
> > > Build errors in arm:allmodconfig are along the line of
> > >
> > > In file included from include/linux/printk.h:5,
> > > from include/linux/kernel.h:13,
> > > from include/linux/clk.h:16,
> > > from drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_drv.h:21,
> > > from drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_drv.c:20:
> > > include/linux/init.h:343:7: error: 'cleanup_module'
> > > specifies less restrictive attribute than its target 'tilcdc_drm_fini': 'cold'
> > >
> > > In addition to a few errors like that, there are literally thousands
> > > of similar warnings.
> >
> > It looks like this is triggered by you switching arm builds from gcc 8
> > to 9, rather than by any code change.
> >
>
> After reverting to gcc 8.3.0 for arm, I get:
>
> Build results:
> total: 136 pass: 136 fail: 0
> Qemu test results:
> total: 229 pass: 229 fail: 0
>
> Sorry for the noise.
Great, thanks for checking.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
I'm always amazed by the number of people who take up solipsism because
they heard someone else explain it. - E*Borg on alt.fan.pratchett
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part