Re: [GIT PULL] treewide conversion to sizeof_member() for v5.5-rc1

From: joe
Date: Sun Dec 08 2019 - 18:40:34 EST

On 2019-12-08 17:19, Linus Torvalds wrote:
maybe it's
the 13-year old in me, but "sizeof_member()" just makes me go "that's

The 13 year old in you could grow up one day. Most 13 year olds don't even know that word btw.

I _can_ see why we'd want to standardize on one of the tree versions
we have, but I can't really see the problem with the existing #define
that we have, and that is used (admittedly not all that much):

Call it what the standard calls it.