Re: [PATCH v3] video: fbdev: vesafb: add missed release_region

From: Chuhong Yuan
Date: Tue Mar 24 2020 - 09:36:07 EST


On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 8:01 PM Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
<b.zolnierkie@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> On 3/10/20 3:35 AM, Chuhong Yuan wrote:
> > The driver forgets to free the I/O region in remove and probe
> > failure.
> > Add the missed calls to fix it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chuhong Yuan <hslester96@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > Changes in v3:
> > - Revise the commit message.
> > - Add an error handler to suit the "goto error" before request_region().
> > - Revise the order of operations in remove.
> >
> > drivers/video/fbdev/vesafb.c | 9 ++++++---
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/vesafb.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/vesafb.c
> > index a1fe24ea869b..c7bc9ace47d4 100644
> > --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/vesafb.c
> > +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/vesafb.c
> > @@ -439,7 +439,7 @@ static int vesafb_probe(struct platform_device *dev)
> > "vesafb: abort, cannot ioremap video memory 0x%x @ 0x%lx\n",
> > vesafb_fix.smem_len, vesafb_fix.smem_start);
> > err = -EIO;
> > - goto err;
> > + goto err_release_region;
> > }
> >
> > printk(KERN_INFO "vesafb: framebuffer at 0x%lx, mapped to 0x%p, "
> > @@ -458,15 +458,17 @@ static int vesafb_probe(struct platform_device *dev)
> >
> > if (fb_alloc_cmap(&info->cmap, 256, 0) < 0) {
> > err = -ENOMEM;
> > - goto err;
> > + goto err_release_region;
> > }
> > if (register_framebuffer(info)<0) {
> > err = -EINVAL;
> > fb_dealloc_cmap(&info->cmap);
> > - goto err;
> > + goto err_release_region;
> > }
> > fb_info(info, "%s frame buffer device\n", info->fix.id);
> > return 0;
> > +err_release_region:
> > + release_region(0x3c0, 32);
>
> This is incorrect.
>
> The cleanup order should be the reverse of the probing order.
>
> Also request_region() return value is not checked by the driver
> (there is a comment that it can fail and is optional):
>
> /* request failure does not faze us, as vgacon probably has this
> * region already (FIXME) */
> request_region(0x3c0, 32, "vesafb");
>
> so what would happen in such case? It seems that unconditionally
> doing the release will result in freeing the I/O region owned by
> the other driver (vgacon)..
>

Maybe we can add a field to represent whether the request succeeds?
request_region() returns source *, we can store it and check whether
it is null when
we are going to call release_region().

> > err:
> > arch_phys_wc_del(par->wc_cookie);
> > if (info->screen_base)
> > @@ -481,6 +483,7 @@ static int vesafb_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > struct fb_info *info = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> >
> > unregister_framebuffer(info);
> > + release_region(0x3c0, 32);
> > framebuffer_release(info);
> >
> > return 0;
> >
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
> Samsung R&D Institute Poland
> Samsung Electronics