Re: [PATCH 0/2] i2c: at91: Add support for programmable clock source

[Wolfram Sang]

> > > Not even patch 1/2?
> > 
> > we can keep the new compatible, but patch 2/2 needs to be split.
> 
> For me it is OK to use the compatible string 'microchip,sam9x60-i2c'

I'll drop this patch for now. If anyone is still interested in it,
please resend.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature