Re: [PATCH 2/8] dt-bindings: soc: socionext: Add UniPhier SoC-glue logic

From: Kunihiko Hayashi
Date: Thu Dec 01 2022 - 03:30:06 EST


On 2022/12/01 0:27, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 30/11/2022 09:59, Kunihiko Hayashi wrote:
Hi Krzysztof,

On 2022/11/29 23:43, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 29/11/2022 11:35, Kunihiko Hayashi wrote:
Add devicetree binding schema for the SoC-glue logic implemented on
Socionext Uniphier SoCs.

This SoC-glue logic is a set of miscellaneous function registers
handling signals for specific devices outside system components,
and also has multiple functions such as I/O pinmux, usb-phy, debug,
clock-mux for a specific SoC, and so on.

Signed-off-by: Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
.../socionext,uniphier-soc-glue.yaml | 94 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 94 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/socionext/socionext,uniphier-soc-glue.yaml

diff --git
a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/socionext/socionext,uniphier-soc-glue.yaml
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/socionext/socionext,uniphier-soc-glue.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..3f571e3e1339
--- /dev/null
+++
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/socionext/socionext,uniphier-soc-glue.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
+%YAML 1.2
+---
+$id:
http://devicetree.org/schemas/soc/socionext/socionext,uniphier-soc-glue.yaml#
+$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
+
+title: Socionext UniPhier SoC-glue logic
+
+maintainers:
+ - Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
+
+description: |+
+ SoC-glue logic implemented on Socionext UniPhier SoCs is a collection
of
+ miscellaneous function registers handling signals outside system
components.
+
+properties:
+ compatible:
+ items:
+ - enum:
+ - socionext,uniphier-ld4-soc-glue
+ - socionext,uniphier-pro4-soc-glue
+ - socionext,uniphier-pro5-soc-glue
+ - socionext,uniphier-pxs2-soc-glue
+ - socionext,uniphier-ld6b-soc-glue
+ - socionext,uniphier-sld8-soc-glue
+ - socionext,uniphier-ld11-soc-glue
+ - socionext,uniphier-ld20-soc-glue
+ - socionext,uniphier-pxs3-soc-glue
+ - socionext,uniphier-nx1-soc-glue
+ - socionext,uniphier-soc-glue

This one looks generic - why having it next to specific ones?

SoC-glue has the same register set, but different implementations
for each SoC.

Sure, but you did not model it as a compatible fallback, but like one of
variants. It is not tied to specific SoC, thus too generic.

I understand. It should be placed in parallel with enum.

item:
- enum:
- ...
- ...
- const: socionext,uniphier-soc-glue

I thought of defining the same register set as a common specs,
but each compatibles are sufficient. I'll remove it.

So currently drop it.


Same question for your previous patch - socionext,uniphier-sysctrl.

And similarly to previous patch, do you expect child nodes everywhere?

In case of this SoC-glue logic, all SoCs has pinctrl, however,
only SoCs with USB2 host has usb-controller (phy-hub).
And only legacy SoCs implement clock-controller (clk-mux) here.

Should child nodes that exist only in a specific "compatible" be defined
conditionally?

No, rather define them in top level but disallow for specific compatibles:

allOf:
- if:
....
then:
patternProperties:
...: false

Assuming that this does not over-complicate schema.

OK. Some properties are applied for a few compatibles, so I think it is
available to use "else:".

allOf:
- if:
...
else:
patternProperties:
...: false

Thank you,

---
Best Regards
Kunihiko Hayashi