Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] dt-bindings: iommu: arm,smmu: enable clocks for sa8775p Adreno SMMU

From: Bartosz Golaszewski
Date: Tue May 16 2023 - 07:34:50 EST


On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 12:33 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 16/05/2023 12:07, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 2:58 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> The GPU SMMU will require the clocks property to be set so put the
> >> relevant compatible into the adreno if-then block.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml | 6 ++++--
> >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml
> >> index ba677d401e24..53bed0160be8 100644
> >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml
> >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml
> >> @@ -79,6 +79,7 @@ properties:
> >> - description: Qcom Adreno GPUs implementing "qcom,smmu-500" and "arm,mmu-500"
> >> items:
> >> - enum:
> >> + - qcom,sa8775p-smmu-500
> >> - qcom,sc7280-smmu-500
> >> - qcom,sm6115-smmu-500
> >> - qcom,sm6125-smmu-500
> >> @@ -331,7 +332,9 @@ allOf:
> >> properties:
> >> compatible:
> >> contains:
> >> - const: qcom,sc7280-smmu-500
> >> + enum:
> >> + - qcom,sa8775p-smmu-500
> >> + - qcom,sc7280-smmu-500
> >> then:
> >> properties:
> >> clock-names:
> >> @@ -413,7 +416,6 @@ allOf:
> >> - nvidia,smmu-500
> >> - qcom,qcm2290-smmu-500
> >> - qcom,qdu1000-smmu-500
> >> - - qcom,sa8775p-smmu-500
> >> - qcom,sc7180-smmu-500
> >> - qcom,sc8180x-smmu-500
> >> - qcom,sc8280xp-smmu-500
> >> --
> >> 2.37.2
> >>
> >
> > Gentle ping for a review and a pick up. The DT patches that use this
> > schema are in next now so check_dtbs will now fail.
>
> I assume this is not for me, as you got my tag in v2, which I repeated
> in v3.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>

The patch changed significantly between v2 and v3 which is why I
dropped your ack as explained in the cover letter for v3. The response
I got for v3 looked like an automated email so I didn't re-collect the
tag. If this looks good to you - could you still Ack it officially
with the adreno compatible changes?

Bart