Re: [PATCH 1/5] ASoC: mediatek: mt8188: separate ADDA playback dai from capture dai

From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
Date: Wed May 17 2023 - 07:40:42 EST


Il 17/05/23 13:15, Trevor Wu ha scritto:
MT8188 will support SOF. In SOF, be_hw_params_fixup callback are used to
configure BE hardware parameters. However, playback and capture stream
share the same callback function in which it can't know the stream type.

It's possible to require different paremters for playback and capture
stream, so separate them into two dais for SOF usage.

Signed-off-by: Trevor Wu <trevor.wu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
sound/soc/mediatek/mt8188/mt8188-afe-common.h | 3 +-
sound/soc/mediatek/mt8188/mt8188-dai-adda.c | 76 ++++++++++---------
sound/soc/mediatek/mt8188/mt8188-mt6359.c | 34 +++++++--
3 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8188/mt8188-afe-common.h b/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8188/mt8188-afe-common.h
index eb7e57c239bd..1304d685a306 100644
--- a/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8188/mt8188-afe-common.h
+++ b/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8188/mt8188-afe-common.h
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ enum {
MT8188_AFE_MEMIF_END,
MT8188_AFE_MEMIF_NUM = (MT8188_AFE_MEMIF_END - MT8188_AFE_MEMIF_START),
MT8188_AFE_IO_START = MT8188_AFE_MEMIF_END,
- MT8188_AFE_IO_ADDA = MT8188_AFE_IO_START,
+ MT8188_AFE_IO_DL_SRC = MT8188_AFE_IO_START,
MT8188_AFE_IO_DMIC_IN,
MT8188_AFE_IO_DPTX,
MT8188_AFE_IO_ETDM_START,
@@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ enum {
MT8188_AFE_IO_ETDM_NUM =
(MT8188_AFE_IO_ETDM_END - MT8188_AFE_IO_ETDM_START),
MT8188_AFE_IO_PCM = MT8188_AFE_IO_ETDM_END,
+ MT8188_AFE_IO_UL_SRC,
MT8188_AFE_IO_END,
MT8188_AFE_IO_NUM = (MT8188_AFE_IO_END - MT8188_AFE_IO_START),
MT8188_DAI_END = MT8188_AFE_IO_END,
diff --git a/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8188/mt8188-dai-adda.c b/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8188/mt8188-dai-adda.c
index fed9f927e623..9a6673a6f28a 100644
--- a/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8188/mt8188-dai-adda.c
+++ b/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8188/mt8188-dai-adda.c
@@ -53,8 +53,7 @@ enum {
};
struct mtk_dai_adda_priv {
- unsigned int dl_rate;
- unsigned int ul_rate;
+ bool hires_required;
};
static unsigned int afe_adda_dl_rate_transform(struct mtk_base_afe *afe,

..snip..

@@ -503,13 +495,15 @@ static int mtk_dai_adda_hw_params(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
dev_dbg(afe->dev, "%s(), id %d, stream %d, rate %u\n",
__func__, id, substream->stream, rate);
- if (substream->stream == SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK) {
- adda_priv->dl_rate = rate;
+ if (rate > ADDA_HIRES_THRES)
+ adda_priv->hires_required = 1;
+ else
+ adda_priv->hires_required = 0;
+

hires_required is a boolean, so assigning 1 or 0 should be replaced with
assigning true or false; regardless of that, what about...

adda_priv->hires_required = (rate > ADDA_HIRES_THRES);

+ if (substream->stream == SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK)
ret = mtk_dai_da_configure(afe, rate, id);
- } else {
- adda_priv->ul_rate = rate;
+ else
ret = mtk_dai_ad_configure(afe, rate, id);
- }
return ret;
}

Regards,
Angelo