Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the rcu tree

[Paul E. McKenney]

On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 10:12:49AM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 5/16/23 06:19, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 01:28:23PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
> > > On 5/11/23 10:52, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 09:00:10AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > 
> > > > > The following commit is also in the kselftest-fixes tree as a different
> > > > > commit (but the same patch):
> > > > > 
> > > > >     6d9ed63d8bc3 ("tools/nolibc: Fix build of stdio.h due to header ordering")
> > > > > 
> > > > > This is commit
> > > > > 
> > > > >     d7eafa64a158 ("tools/nolibc: Fix build of stdio.h due to header ordering")
> > > > > 
> > > > > in the kselftest-fixes tree.
> > > > 
> > > > I can currently cleanly remove this commit from the rest of the nolibc
> > > > commits in -rcu.
> > > > 
> > > > However, I might need to re-introduce it in some way or another, for
> > > > example, if there are dependencies on it by future nolibc patches.
> > > > (I expect another batch in a few days.)
> > > > 
> > > > So how would you like to proceed?
> > > 
> > > Paul,
> > > 
> > > I can drop this from linux-kselftest fixes if that is the easier path.
> > > Just let me know.
> > 
> > That would work better for me, less need to keep track of different
> > commits in different trees.  So could you please drop this one?
> 
> Done. Dropped d7eafa64a158 from linux-kselftest fixes.

Thank you, Shuah!

							Thanx, Paul