Re: [PATCH 2/5] of: reserved_mem: Implement alloc-{bottom-up,top-down}

From: Konrad Dybcio
Date: Wed May 17 2023 - 15:29:16 EST




On 15.05.2023 12:12, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
> Use memblock_set_bottom_up() to specify an explicit allocation order for
> dynamic reservations with "alloc-ranges". Since the default value varies
> between architectures the previous value is saved and restored after
> trying the allocations.
>
> If neither alloc-bottom-up or alloc-top-down are specified the previous
> implementation-defined allocation order is preserved.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
Acked-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx>

Konrad
> drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c | 9 ++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c b/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c
> index 948efa9f99e3..6443140deacf 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c
> @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ static int __init __reserved_mem_alloc_size(unsigned long node,
> phys_addr_t base = 0, align = 0, size;
> int len;
> const __be32 *prop;
> - bool nomap;
> + bool nomap, prev_bottom_up;
> int ret;
>
> prop = of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "size", &len);
> @@ -130,6 +130,12 @@ static int __init __reserved_mem_alloc_size(unsigned long node,
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> + prev_bottom_up = memblock_bottom_up();
> + if (of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "alloc-bottom-up", NULL))
> + memblock_set_bottom_up(true);
> + if (of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "alloc-top-down", NULL))
> + memblock_set_bottom_up(false);
> +
> base = 0;
>
> while (len > 0) {
> @@ -148,6 +154,7 @@ static int __init __reserved_mem_alloc_size(unsigned long node,
> len -= t_len;
> }
>
> + memblock_set_bottom_up(prev_bottom_up);
> } else {
> ret = early_init_dt_alloc_reserved_memory_arch(size, align,
> 0, 0, nomap, &base);
>