RE: Bug report: kernel paniced when system hibernates
From: JeeHeng Sia
Date: Wed May 17 2023 - 21:29:38 EST
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2023 10:42 PM
> To: Song Shuai <suagrfillet@xxxxxxxxx>; Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>; Andrew Jones <ajones@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Anup Patel
> <anup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; JeeHeng Sia <jeeheng.sia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Leyfoon Tan
> <leyfoon.tan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mason Huo <mason.huo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@xxxxxxxxxx>; Guo Ren
> <guoren@xxxxxxxxxx>; linux-riscv <linux-riscv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Conor
> Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Fwd: Bug report: kernel paniced when system hibernates
>
> Sorry, pressed "reply" instead of "reply all"...
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> From: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed, May 17, 2023 at 4:40 PM
> Subject: Re: Bug report: kernel paniced when system hibernates
> To: Song Shuai <suagrfillet@xxxxxxxxx>, Anup Patel
> <anup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Atish Kumar Patra <atishp@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 1:05 PM Song Shuai <suagrfillet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 于2023年5月17日周三 08:58写道：
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 1:12 PM Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Song,
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 11:24 AM Song Shuai <suagrfillet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Description of problem:
> > > > >
> > > > > The latest hibernation support[1] of RISC-V Linux produced a kernel panic.
> > > > > The entire log has been posted at this link: https://termbin.com/sphl .
> > > > >
> > > > > How reproducible:
> > > > >
> > > > > You can reproduce it with the following step :
> > > > >
> > > > > 1. prepare the environment with
> > > > > - Qemu-virt v8.0.0 (with OpenSbi v1.2)
> > > > > - Linux v6.4-rc1
> > > > >
> > > > > 2. start the Qemu virt
> > > > > ```sh
> > > > > $ cat ~/8_riscv/start_latest.sh
> > > > > #!/bin/bash
> > > > > /home/song/8_riscv/3_acpi/qemu/ooo/usr/local/bin/qemu-system-riscv64 \
> > > > > -smp 2 -m 4G -nographic -machine virt \
> > > > > -kernel /home/song/9_linux/linux/00_rv_test/arch/riscv/boot/Image \
> > > > > -append "root=/dev/vda ro eaylycon=uart8250,mmio,0x10000000
> > > > > early_ioremap_debug console=ttyS0 loglevel=8 memblock=debug
> > > > > no_console_suspend audit=0 3" \
> > > > > -drive file=/home/song/8_riscv/fedora/stage4-disk.img,format=raw,id=hd0 \
> > > > > -device virtio-blk-device,drive=hd0 \
> > > > > -drive file=/home/song/8_riscv/fedora/adisk.qcow2,format=qcow2,id=hd1 \
> > > > > -device virtio-blk-device,drive=hd1 \
> > > > > -gdb tcp::1236 #-S
> > > > > ```
> > > > > 3. execute hibernation
> > > > >
> > > > > ```sh
> > > > > swapon /dev/vdb2 # this is my swap disk
> > > > >
> > > > > echo disk > /sys/power/state
> > > > > ```
> > > > >
> > > > > 4. Then you will encounter the kernel panic logged in the above link
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Other Information:
> > > > >
> > > > > After my initial and incomplete dig-up, the commit (3335068f8721
> > > > > "riscv: Use PUD/P4D/PGD pages for the linear mapping")[2]
> > > > > is closely related to this panic. This commit uses re-defined
> > > > > `MIN_MEMBLOCK_ADDR` to discover the entire system memory
> > > > > and extends the `va_pa_offset` from `kernel_map.phys_addr` to
> > > > > `phys_ram_base` for linear memory mapping.
> > > > >
> > > > > If the firmware delivered the firmware memory region (like: a PMP
> > > > > protected region in OpenSbi) without "no-map" propriety,
> > > > > this commit will result in firmware memory being directly mapped by
> > > > > `create_linear_mapping_page_table()`.
> > > > >
> > > > > We can see the mapping via ptdump :
> > > > > ```c
> > > > > ---[ Linear mapping ]---
> > > > > 0xff60000000000000-0xff60000000200000 0x0000000080000000 2M PMD D A G
> > > > > . . W R V ------------- the firmware memory
> > > > > 0xff60000000200000-0xff60000000c00000 0x0000000080200000 10M PMD D A G . . . R V
> > > > > 0xff60000000c00000-0xff60000001000000 0x0000000080c00000 4M PMD D A G . . W R V
> > > > > 0xff60000001000000-0xff60000001600000 0x0000000081000000 6M PMD D A G . . . R V
> > > > > 0xff60000001600000-0xff60000040000000 0x0000000081600000 1002M PMD D A
> > > > > G . . W R V
> > > > > 0xff60000040000000-0xff60000100000000 0x00000000c0000000 3G PUD D A G . . W R V
> > > > > ---[ Modules/BPF mapping ]---
> > > > > ---[ Kernel mapping ]---
> > > > > 0xffffffff80000000-0xffffffff80a00000 0x0000000080200000 10M PMD D A G . X . R V
> > > > > 0xffffffff80a00000-0xffffffff80c00000 0x0000000080c00000 2M PMD D A G . . . R V
> > > > > 0xffffffff80c00000-0xffffffff80e00000 0x0000000080e00000 2M PMD D A G . . W R V
> > > > > 0xffffffff80e00000-0xffffffff81400000 0x0000000081000000 6M PMD D A G . . . R V
> > > > > 0xffffffff81400000-0xffffffff81800000 0x0000000081600000 4M PMD
> > > > > ```
> > > > >
> > > > > In the hibernation process, `swsusp_save()` calls
> > > > > `copy_data_pages(©_bm, &orig_bm)` to copy these two memory
> > > > > bitmaps,
> > > > > the Oops(load access fault) occurred while copying the page of
> > > > > PAGE_OFFSET (which maps the firmware memory).
> > > >
> > > > I'm not saying that the hibernation process is in fault here, but
> > > > that's weird that it is trying to access pages that are not available
> > > > to the kernel: this region is mapped in the page table so that we can
> > > > use a 1GB page, but it is reserved so that it is not added to the
> > > > kernel memory pool.
> > Yes, my fault, the Test2 is not a correct testcase.
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I also did two other tests:
> > > > > Test1:
> > > > >
> > > > > The hibernation works well in the kernel with the commit 3335068f8721
> > > > > reverted at least in the current environment.
> > > > >
> > > > > Test2:
> > > > >
> > > > > I built a simple kernel module to simulate the access of the value of
> > > > > `PAGE_OFFSET` address, and the same panic occurred with the load
> > > > > access fault.
> > > > > So hibernation seems not the only case to trigger this panic.
> > > > >
> > > > > Finally, should we always leave the firmware memory with
> > > > > `MEMBLOCK_NOMAP` flag by some efforts from Linux or OpenSbi (at least
> > > > > in the current environment) or any other suggestions?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > I actually removed this flag a few years ago, and I have to admit that
> > > > I need to check if that's necessary: the goal of commit 3335068f8721
> > > > ("riscv: Use PUD/P4D/PGD pages for the linear mapping") is to expose
> > > > the "right" start of DRAM so that we can align virtual and physical
> > > > addresses on a 1GB boundary.
> > > >
> > > > So I have to check if a nomap region is actually added as a
> > > > memblock.memory.regions[] or not: if yes, that's perfect, let's add
> > > > the nomap attributes to the PMP regions, otherwise, I don't think that
> > > > is a good solution.
> > >
> > > So here is the current linear mapping without nomap in openSBI:
> > >
> > > ---[ Linear mapping ]---
> > > 0xff60000000000000-0xff60000000200000 0x0000000080000000 2M
> > > PMD D A G . . W R V
> > > 0xff60000000200000-0xff60000000e00000 0x0000000080200000 12M
> > > PMD D A G . . . R V
> > >
> > > And below the linear mapping with nomap in openSBI:
> > >
> > > ---[ Linear mapping ]---
> > > 0xff60000000080000-0xff60000000200000 0x0000000080080000 1536K
> > > PTE D A G . . W R V
> > > 0xff60000000200000-0xff60000000e00000 0x0000000080200000 12M
> > > PMD D A G . . . R V
> > >
> > > So adding nomap does not misalign virtual and physical addresses, it
> > > prevents the usage of 1GB page for this area though, so that's a
> > > solution, we just lose this 1GB page here.
> > >
> > > But even though that may be the fix, I think we also need to fix that
> > > in the kernel as it would break compatibility with certain versions of
> > > openSBI *if* we fix openSBI...So here are a few solutions:
> > >
> > > 1. we can mark all "mmode_resv" nodes in the device tree as nomap,
> > > before the linear mapping is established (IIUC, those nodes are added
> > > by openSBI to advertise PMP regions)
> > > -> This amounts to the same fix as opensbi and we lose the 1GB hugepage.
> > > 2. we can tweak pfn_is_nosave function to *not* save pfn corresponding
> > > to PMP regions
> > > -> We don't lose the 1GB hugepage \o/
> > > 3. we can use register_nosave_region() to not save the "mmode_resv"
> > > regions (x86 does that
> > > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.4-rc1/source/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c#L753)
> > > -> We don't lose the 1GB hugepage \o/
> > > 4. Given JeeHeng pointer to
> > > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.4-rc1/source/kernel/power/snapshot.c#L1340,
> > > we can mark those pages as non-readable and make the hibernation
> > > process not save those pages
> > > -> Very late-in-the-day idea, not sure what it's worth, we also
> > > lose the 1GB hugepage...
> > >
> > > To me, the best solution is 3 as it would prepare for other similar
> > > issues later, it is similar to x86 and it allows us to keep 1GB
> > > hugepages.
> >
> > I agree,
> > register_nosave_region() is a good way in the early initialization to
> > set page frames (like the PMP regions) in forbidden_pages_map and mark
> > them as no-savable for hibernation.
> >
> > Look forward to your fixing.
>
> Please find below the patch in question, which worked for me, if you
> can give it a try. As mentioned by Conor, I'd like to make sure the
> mmode_resv "interface" is really what we need to use before
> upstreaming this fix @Anup Patel @Atish Kumar Patra
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/hibernate.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/hibernate.c
> index 264b2dcdd67e..9ad8bf5c956b 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/hibernate.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/hibernate.c
> @@ -24,6 +24,8 @@
> #include <linux/sched.h>
> #include <linux/suspend.h>
> #include <linux/utsname.h>
> +#include <linux/of_fdt.h>
> +#include <linux/libfdt.h>
>
> /* The logical cpu number we should resume on, initialised to a
> non-cpu number. */
> static int sleep_cpu = -EINVAL;
> @@ -67,6 +69,45 @@ static void arch_hdr_invariants(struct
> arch_hibernate_hdr_invariants *i)
> memcpy(i->uts_version, init_utsname()->version, sizeof(i->uts_version));
> }
>
> +void __init register_nosave_regions(void)
> +{
> +#define MMODE_RESV "mmode_resv"
> + int node, child;
> + const void *fdt = initial_boot_params;
> +
> + node = fdt_path_offset(fdt, "/reserved-memory");
> + if (node < 0)
> + return;
> +
> + fdt_for_each_subnode(child, fdt, node) {
> + phys_addr_t base, size;
> + const __be32 *prop;
> + const char *uname;
> + int len;
> + int t_len = (dt_root_addr_cells + dt_root_size_cells)
> * sizeof(__be32);
> +
> + uname = fdt_get_name(fdt, child, NULL);
> +
> + if (!uname || strncmp(uname, MMODE_RESV,
> sizeof(MMODE_RESV) - 1))
> + continue;
> +
> + prop = of_get_flat_dt_prop(child, "reg", &len);
> + if (!prop)
> + continue;
> +
> + while (len >= t_len) {
> + base = dt_mem_next_cell(dt_root_addr_cells, &prop);
> + size = dt_mem_next_cell(dt_root_size_cells, &prop);
> +
> + if (size)
> + register_nosave_region(phys_to_pfn(base),
> +
> phys_to_pfn(base + size));
> +
> + len -= t_len;
> + }
> + }
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Check if the given pfn is in the 'nosave' section.
> */
> @@ -421,6 +462,8 @@ static int __init riscv_hibernate_init(void)
> if (WARN_ON(!hibernate_cpu_context))
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> + register_nosave_regions();
> +
> return 0;
> }
This will help to prevent Hibernation core from accessing the region. But shouldn't the MMODE_RESV be implemented in the mm/init.c?
What is the plan for the kernel page table? Will the PMP reserved region continue to be exposed to the page table?
>
> > >
> > > I have been thinking, and to me nomap does not provide anything since
> > > the kernel should not address this memory range, so if it does, we
> > > must fix the kernel.
> > >
> > > Let me know what you all think, I'll be preparing a PoC of 3 in the meantime!
> > >
> > > Alex
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > And a last word: Mike Rapoport recently gave a speech [1] where he
> > > > states that mapping the linear mapping with hugepages does not give
> > > > rise to better performance so *maybe* reverting this commit may be a
> > > > solution too as it may not provide the expected benefits (even though
> > > > I'd rather have it and another benefit of mapping the linear mapping
> > > > with 1GB hugepages is that it is faster to boot, but that needs to be
> > > > measured).
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://lwn.net/Articles/931406/
> > > >
> > > > > Please correct me if I'm wrong.
> > > > >
> > > > > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230330064321.1008373-5-jeeheng.sia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230324155421.271544-4-alexghiti@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Song
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for the thorough report!
> > > >
> > > > Alex
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Thanks,
> > Song