Re: [PATCH net-next 06/11] net: page_pool: avoid calling no-op externals when possible
From: Alexander Lobakin
Date: Thu May 18 2023 - 10:15:36 EST
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 17 May 2023 21:08:04 -0700
> On Tue, 16 May 2023 18:18:36 +0200 Alexander Lobakin wrote:
>> + /* Try to avoid calling no-op syncs */
>> + pool->p.flags |= PP_FLAG_DMA_MAYBE_SYNC;
>> + pool->p.flags &= ~PP_FLAG_DMA_SYNC_DEV;
>> }
>>
>> if (PAGE_POOL_DMA_USE_PP_FRAG_COUNT &&
>> @@ -323,6 +327,12 @@ static bool page_pool_dma_map(struct page_pool *pool, struct page *page)
>>
>> page_pool_set_dma_addr(page, dma);
>>
>> + if ((pool->p.flags & PP_FLAG_DMA_MAYBE_SYNC) &&
>> + dma_need_sync(pool->p.dev, dma)) {
>> + pool->p.flags |= PP_FLAG_DMA_SYNC_DEV;
>> + pool->p.flags &= ~PP_FLAG_DMA_MAYBE_SYNC;
>> + }
>
> is it just me or does it feel cleaner to allocate a page at init,
> and throw it into the cache, rather than adding a condition to a
> fast(ish) path?
When recycling is on, not that fast -- new allocations occur relatively
rarely and it's allocations anyway, one `if` doesn't change anything there.
And seems like I didn't get the sentence regarding "allocate and throw"
:s This condition just disables the shortcut if any new page suddenly
requires real DMA syncs (and if it does, then the sync a line below will
take way more time than 1 more `if` anyway).
Thanks,
Olek