Re: [PATCH net-next V7] dt-bindings: net: xlnx,axi-ethernet: convert bindings document to yaml

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 18/05/2023 08:17, Gaddam, Sarath Babu Naidu wrote:
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Gaddam, Sarath Babu Naidu
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 3, 2023 3:01 PM
>> To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>;
>> davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx; kuba@xxxxxxxxxx;
>> pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx; robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx;
>> krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx
>> Cc: michal.simek@xxxxxxxxxx; radhey.shyam.pandey@xxxxxxxxxx;
>> netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-
>> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Sarangi,
>> Anirudha <anirudha.sarangi@xxxxxxx>; Katakam, Harini
>> <harini.katakam@xxxxxxx>; git (AMD-Xilinx) <git@xxxxxxx>
>> Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next V7] dt-bindings: net: xlnx,axi-ethernet:
>> convert bindings document to yaml
>>
>>
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Sent: Tuesday, May 2, 2023 3:56 PM
>>> To: Gaddam, Sarath Babu Naidu
>>> <sarath.babu.naidu.gaddam@xxxxxxx>; davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx;
>>> edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx; kuba@xxxxxxxxxx; pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx;
>>> robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx
>>> Cc: michal.simek@xxxxxxxxxx; radhey.shyam.pandey@xxxxxxxxxx;
>>> netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-
>>> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Sarangi,
>>> Anirudha <anirudha.sarangi@xxxxxxx>; Katakam, Harini
>>> <harini.katakam@xxxxxxx>; git (AMD-Xilinx) <git@xxxxxxx>
>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V7] dt-bindings: net: xlnx,axi-ethernet:
>>> convert bindings document to yaml
>>>
>>> On 28/03/2023 14:52, Gaddam, Sarath Babu Naidu wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2023 9:22 PM
>>>>> To: Gaddam, Sarath Babu Naidu
>>>>> <sarath.babu.naidu.gaddam@xxxxxxx>; davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx;
>>>>> edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx; kuba@xxxxxxxxxx; pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx;
>>>>> robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> Cc: michal.simek@xxxxxxxxxx; radhey.shyam.pandey@xxxxxxxxxx;
>>>>> netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-
>>>>> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Sarangi,
>>>>> Anirudha <anirudha.sarangi@xxxxxxx>; Katakam, Harini
>>>>> <harini.katakam@xxxxxxx>; git (AMD-Xilinx) <git@xxxxxxx>
>>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V7] dt-bindings: net: xlnx,axi-ethernet:
>>>>> convert bindings document to yaml
>>>>>
>>>>> On 08/03/2023 07:12, Sarath Babu Naidu Gaddam wrote:
>>>>>> From: Radhey Shyam Pandey <radhey.shyam.pandey@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Convert the bindings document for Xilinx AXI Ethernet Subsystem
>>> from
>>>>>> txt to yaml. No changes to existing binding description.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> (...)
>>>>>
>>>>>> +properties:
>>>>>> +  compatible:
>>>>>> +    enum:
>>>>>> +      - xlnx,axi-ethernet-1.00.a
>>>>>> +      - xlnx,axi-ethernet-1.01.a
>>>>>> +      - xlnx,axi-ethernet-2.01.a
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +  reg:
>>>>>> +    description:
>>>>>> +      Address and length of the IO space, as well as the address
>>>>>> +      and length of the AXI DMA controller IO space, unless
>>>>>> +      axistream-connected is specified, in which case the reg
>>>>>> +      attribute of the node referenced by it is used.
>>>>>
>>>>> Did you test it with axistream-connected? The schema and
>>>>> description feel contradictory and tests would point the issue.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for review comments. We tested with axistream-connected
>> and
>>> did
>>>> not observe any errors. Do you anticipate any issues/errors ?
>>>
>>> Yes, I anticipate errors. What you wrote here looks incorrect based on
>>> the schema.
>>>
>>> Also, See also my further comments (or you ignored them?).
>>>
>>> You can come many months after my review to ask about details, to be
>>> sure I will forget the topic.
>>
>>
>> Hi Krzysztof, Apologies for miscommunication. I replied to this thread on
>> March 28 and said that I would address remaining review comments in
>> the next version.
>>
>> Lore link:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/MW5PR12MB559880B0E220BDBD64E06D24
>> 87889@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/MW5PR12MB5598678BB9AB6EC2FFC424F48
>> 7889@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
>>
>> I planned to send next version with phy-mode and pcs-handle maxItems
>> fixed.but I wanted to close on the axistream-connected discussion before
>> doing so.
>>
>> Related to axistream-connected discussion:
>> I already ran dt binding check for schema and dts node validation. I
>> assume this should point any errors on it.

And how do we know that you tested correct DTS with it?

>>
> 
> Hi Krzysztof, Could you please comment on this ? Please let me if I missed
> any changes or comments.

I don't think anything improved in this patchset. The binding has
incomplete and I believe incorrect constraints for axistream-connected.
You did not provide DTS to prove me otherwise. If you are not going to
fix the issue nor provide DTS, what I can say more? Looks wrong.

Best regards,
Krzysztof