Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] mm: ptep_deref() conversion
From: SeongJae Park
Date: Thu May 18 2023 - 13:22:18 EST
On Thu, 18 May 2023 12:07:27 +0100 Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Convert all instances of direct pte_t* dereferencing to instead use
> ptep_deref() helper. By default, the helper does a direct dereference as
> before, but it can (and will) be overridden by the architecture to fully
> encapsulate the contents of the pte. Arch code is deliberately not
> converted, as the arch code knows best.
>
> Conversion was done using Coccinelle:
>
> ----
>
> // $ make coccicheck \
> // COCCI=ptepderef.cocci \
> // SPFLAGS="--include-headers" \
> // MODE=patch
>
> virtual patch
>
> @ depends on patch @
> pte_t *v;
> @@
>
> - *v
> + ptep_deref(v)
>
> ----
>
> Then reviewed and hand-edited to avoid multiple unnecessary calls to
> ptep_deref(), instead opting to store the result of a single in a
> variable, where it is correct to do so. This will benefit arch-overrides
> that may be more complex than a simple (optimizable) pointer
> dereference.
>
> Included is a fix for an issue in an earlier version of this patch that
> was pointed out by kernel test robot. The issue arose because config
> MMU=n elides definition of the ptep helper functions, including
> ptep_deref(). HUGETLB_PAGE=n configs still define a simple
> huge_ptep_clear_flush() for linking purposes, which dereferences the
> ptep. So when both configs are disabled, this caused a build error
> because ptep_deref() is not defined. Fix by continuing to do a direct
> dereference when MMU=n. This is safe because for this config the arch
> code cannot be trying to virtualize the ptes because none of the ptep
> helpers are defined.
>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202305120142.yXsNEo6H-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/
> Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@xxxxxxx>
[...]
> mm/damon/ops-common.c | 2 +-
> mm/damon/paddr.c | 2 +-
> mm/damon/vaddr.c | 10 +-
For above mm/damon/ part,
Reviewed-by: SeongJae Park <sj@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks,
SJ