Re: [PATCH] scsi: Let scsi_execute_cmd() mark args->sshdr as invalid

[John Garry]

On 18/05/2023 20:54, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > Further to that, I dislike how we pass a pointer to this local sshdr 
> > structure. I would prefer if scsi_execute_cmd() could kmalloc() the 
> > mem for these buffers and the callers could handle free'ing them - I 
> > can put together a patch for that, to see what people think.
>
> sizeof(struct scsi_sense_hdr) = 8. Using kmalloc() to allocate an eight 
> byte data structure sounds like overkill to me. Additionally, making 
> scsi_execute_cmd() allocate struct scsi_sense_hdr and letting the 
> callers free that data structure will make it harder to review whether 
> or not any memory leaks are triggered. No such review is necessary if 
> the scsi_execute_cmd() caller allocates that data structure on the stack.

Sure, what I describe is ideal, but I still just dislike passing both 
sensebuf and hdr into scsi_execute_cmd(). The semantics of how 
scsi_execute_cmd() treats them is vague.

Thanks,
John