[PATCH RESEND 01/13] scsi: ncr53c8xx: Use default @max_active for hostdata->work_q

[Tejun Heo]

From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: scsi: ncr53c8xx: Use default @max_active for hostdata->work_q

hostdata->work_q only hosts a single work item, hostdata->main_task, and
thus doesn't need explicit concurrency limit. Let's use the default
@max_active. This doesn't cost anything and clearly expresses that
@max_active doesn't matter.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Finn Thain <fthain@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
---
Hello,

Resending because I screwed up the cc list in the original posting. The
whole series can be viewed at:

  http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230509015032.3768622-1-tj@xxxxxxxxxx

It's not a must but it'd be great if I can route this through the workqueue
tree so that it can go together with other related and followup cleanups.

Thanks.

 drivers/scsi/NCR5380.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/scsi/NCR5380.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/NCR5380.c
@@ -417,7 +417,7 @@ static int NCR5380_init(struct Scsi_Host
 	INIT_WORK(&hostdata->main_task, NCR5380_main);
 	hostdata->work_q = alloc_workqueue("ncr5380_%d",
 	                        WQ_UNBOUND | WQ_MEM_RECLAIM,
-	                        1, instance->host_no);
+				0, instance->host_no);
 	if (!hostdata->work_q)
 		return -ENOMEM;