Re: [PATCH 11/11] arm64: dtsi: qcom: ipq9574: Add nodes to bring up multipd

From: Manikanta Mylavarapu
Date: Sun May 21 2023 - 12:23:57 EST




On 3/7/2023 9:14 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 07/03/2023 05:41, Manikanta Mylavarapu wrote:
Enable nodes required for multipd remoteproc bring up.

Signed-off-by: Manikanta Mylavarapu <quic_mmanikan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi | 145 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 145 insertions(+)



soc: soc@0 {
compatible = "simple-bus";
#address-cells = <1>;
@@ -829,6 +858,122 @@ IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>, /* int_c */
msi-parent = <&v2m0>;
status = "disabled";
};
+
+ q6v5_wcss: remoteproc@cd00000 {

Be sure you put it in correct place - ordered by unit address.

Sure, i will update it.
+ compatible = "qcom,ipq9574-q6-mpd";
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <1>;
+ ranges;

Why do you need them?

No, it's not required. I will remove.
+ reg = <0x0cd00000 0x4040>;

reg is always a second property.

Sure, i will make it as second property.
+ interrupts-extended = <&intc GIC_SPI 325 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
+ <&wcss_smp2p_in 0 0>,
+ <&wcss_smp2p_in 1 0>,
+ <&wcss_smp2p_in 2 0>,
+ <&wcss_smp2p_in 3 0>;
+ interrupt-names = "wdog",
+ "fatal",
+ "ready",
+ "handover",
+ "stop-ack";
+
+ clocks = <&gcc GCC_ANOC_WCSS_AXI_M_CLK>,
+ <&gcc GCC_WCSS_AHB_S_CLK>,
+ <&gcc GCC_WCSS_ECAHB_CLK>,
+ <&gcc GCC_WCSS_ACMT_CLK>,
+ <&gcc GCC_WCSS_AXI_M_CLK>,
+ <&gcc GCC_Q6_AXIM_CLK>,
+ <&gcc GCC_Q6_AXIM2_CLK>,
+ <&gcc GCC_Q6_AHB_CLK>,
+ <&gcc GCC_Q6_AHB_S_CLK>,
+ <&gcc GCC_Q6SS_BOOT_CLK>,
+ <&gcc GCC_WCSS_DBG_IFC_APB_BDG_CLK>,
+ <&gcc GCC_WCSS_DBG_IFC_ATB_BDG_CLK>,
+ <&gcc GCC_WCSS_DBG_IFC_DAPBUS_BDG_CLK>,
+ <&gcc GCC_WCSS_DBG_IFC_NTS_BDG_CLK>,
+ <&gcc GCC_WCSS_DBG_IFC_APB_CLK>,
+ <&gcc GCC_WCSS_DBG_IFC_ATB_CLK>,
+ <&gcc GCC_WCSS_DBG_IFC_DAPBUS_CLK>,
+ <&gcc GCC_WCSS_DBG_IFC_NTS_CLK>,
+ <&gcc GCC_Q6_TSCTR_1TO2_CLK>,
+ <&gcc GCC_Q6SS_ATBM_CLK>,
+ <&gcc GCC_Q6SS_PCLKDBG_CLK>,
+ <&gcc GCC_Q6SS_TRIG_CLK>,
+ <&gcc GCC_MEM_NOC_Q6_AXI_CLK>,
+ <&gcc GCC_WCSS_Q6_TBU_CLK>,
+ <&gcc GCC_SYS_NOC_WCSS_AHB_CLK>;
+
+ clock-names = "anoc_wcss_axi_m",
+ "wcss_ahb_s",
+ "wcss_ecahb",
+ "wcss_acmt",
+ "wcss_axi_m",
+ "q6_axim",
+ "q6_axim2",
+ "q6_ahb",
+ "q6_ahb_s",
+ "q6ss_boot",
+ "dbg-apb-bdg",
+ "dbg-atb-bdg",
+ "dbg-dapbus-bdg",
+ "dbg-nts-bdg",
+ "dbg-apb",
+ "dbg-atb",
+ "dbg-dapbus",
+ "dbg-nts",
+ "q6_tsctr_1to2_clk",
+ "q6ss_atbm_clk",
+ "q6ss_pclkdbg_clk",
+ "q6ss_trig_clk",
+ "mem_noc_q6_axi",
+ "wcss_q6_tbu",
+ "sys_noc_wcss_ahb";
+
+ assigned-clocks = <&gcc GCC_ANOC_WCSS_AXI_M_CLK>,
+ <&gcc GCC_WCSS_AHB_S_CLK>,
+ <&gcc GCC_WCSS_ECAHB_CLK>,
+ <&gcc GCC_WCSS_ACMT_CLK>,
+ <&gcc GCC_WCSS_AXI_M_CLK>,
+ <&gcc GCC_Q6_AXIM_CLK>,
+ <&gcc GCC_Q6_AXIM2_CLK>,
+ <&gcc GCC_Q6_AHB_CLK>,
+ <&gcc GCC_Q6_AHB_S_CLK>,
+ <&gcc GCC_Q6SS_BOOT_CLK>,
+ <&gcc GCC_MEM_NOC_Q6_AXI_CLK>,
+ <&gcc GCC_WCSS_Q6_TBU_CLK>,
+ <&gcc GCC_SYS_NOC_WCSS_AHB_CLK>;
+
+ assigned-clock-rates = <266666667>,
+ <133333333>,
+ <133333333>,
+ <133333333>,
+ <266666667>,
+ <533000000>,
+ <342857143>,
+ <133333333>,
+ <133333333>,
+ <342857143>,
+ <533000000>,
+ <533000000>,
+ <133333333>;
+
+ qcom,smem-states = <&wcss_smp2p_out 0>,
+ <&wcss_smp2p_out 1>;
+ qcom,smem-state-names = "shutdown",
+ "stop";
+
+ memory-region = <&q6_region>;
+
+ glink-edge {
+ interrupts = <GIC_SPI 321 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+ label = "rtr";
+ qcom,remote-pid = <1>;
+ mboxes = <&apcs_glb 8>;
+ };
+
+ q6_wcss_pd1: remoteproc_pd1 {
+ compatible = "qcom,ipq9574-wcss-ahb-mpd";

Why do you need empty node? Usually there is no benefit and these should
be just part of parent.

Yeah, it should not be empty node. I will correct it.

Thanks & Regards,
Manikanta.
+ };
+ };
};
rpm-glink {

Best regards,
Krzysztof