Re: [PATCH 4/9] mm: vmalloc: Add a per-CPU-zone infrastructure

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 04:53:25PM +0200, Uladzislau Rezki wrote:
> > > +#define fbl_lock(z, i) spin_lock(&fbl(z, i, lock))
> > > +#define fbl_unlock(z, i) spin_unlock(&fbl(z, i, lock))
> > 
> > Even if it is just temporary, I don't think adding these wrappers
> > make much sense.
> > 
> If open-coded, it looks like:
> 
> spin_lock(&z->fbl[BUSY].lock);

Give the fbl structure a name and you can have a local variable for it,
which will make all this a lot more readable.  And then unless there is
a really good reason to iterate over this as an array just have three
of these structs embedded named free, busy and lazy.