Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] rust: sync: reword the `Arc` safety comment for `Send`

From: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo
Date: Tue May 23 2023 - 12:42:03 EST


On 5/23/23 11:44, Alice Ryhl wrote:
The safety comment on `impl Send for Arc` talks about "directly"
accessing the value, when it really means "accessing the value with a
mutable reference". This commit clarifies that.

Suggested-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx>
---
[...]
// SAFETY: It is safe to send `Arc<T>` to another thread when the underlying `T` is `Sync` because
// it effectively means sharing `&T` (which is safe because `T` is `Sync`); additionally, it needs
-// `T` to be `Send` because any thread that has an `Arc<T>` may ultimately access `T` directly, for
-// example, when the reference count reaches zero and `T` is dropped.
+// `T` to be `Send` because any thread that has an `Arc<T>` may ultimately access `T` using a
+// mutable reference, for example, when the reference count reaches zero and `T` is dropped.
unsafe impl<T: ?Sized + Sync + Send> Send for Arc<T> {}
// SAFETY: It is safe to send `&Arc<T>` to another thread when the underlying `T` is `Sync` for the

Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@xxxxxxxxx>