Re: [PATCH v6 3/3] ublk: enable zoned storage support
From: Andreas Hindborg (Samsung)
Date: Mon Jul 10 2023 - 02:33:51 EST
Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Fri, Jul 07, 2023 at 05:04:41PM +0200, Andreas Hindborg (Samsung) wrote:
>>
>> Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>> > On Thu, Jul 06, 2023 at 03:09:30PM +0200, Andreas Hindborg wrote:
>> >> From: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >>
>> >> Add zoned storage support to ublk: report_zones and operations:
>> >> - REQ_OP_ZONE_OPEN
>> >> - REQ_OP_ZONE_CLOSE
>> >> - REQ_OP_ZONE_FINISH
>> >> - REQ_OP_ZONE_RESET
>> >> - REQ_OP_ZONE_APPEND
>> >>
>> >> The zone append feature uses the `addr` field of `struct ublksrv_io_cmd` to
>> >> communicate ALBA back to the kernel. Therefore ublk must be used with the
>> >> user copy feature (UBLK_F_USER_COPY) for zoned storage support to be
>> >> available. Without this feature, ublk will not allow zoned storage support.
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> ---
>> >> drivers/block/Kconfig | 4 +
>> >> drivers/block/ublk_drv.c | 341 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>> >> include/uapi/linux/ublk_cmd.h | 30 +++
>> >> 3 files changed, 363 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>> >>
>> >> diff --git a/drivers/block/Kconfig b/drivers/block/Kconfig
>> >> index 5b9d4aaebb81..3f7bedae8511 100644
>> >> --- a/drivers/block/Kconfig
>> >> +++ b/drivers/block/Kconfig
>> >> @@ -373,6 +373,7 @@ config BLK_DEV_RBD
>> >> config BLK_DEV_UBLK
>> >> tristate "Userspace block driver (Experimental)"
>> >> select IO_URING
>> >> + select BLK_DEV_UBLK_ZONED if BLK_DEV_ZONED
>> >> help
>> >> io_uring based userspace block driver. Together with ublk server, ublk
>> >> has been working well, but interface with userspace or command data
>> >> @@ -402,6 +403,9 @@ config BLKDEV_UBLK_LEGACY_OPCODES
>> >> suggested to enable N if your application(ublk server) switches to
>> >> ioctl command encoding.
>> >>
>> >> +config BLK_DEV_UBLK_ZONED
>> >> + bool
>> >> +
>> >> source "drivers/block/rnbd/Kconfig"
>> >>
>> >> endif # BLK_DEV
>> >> diff --git a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
>> >> index 8d271901efac..a5adcfc976a5 100644
>> >> --- a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
>> >> +++ b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
>> >> @@ -56,22 +56,28 @@
>> >> | UBLK_F_USER_RECOVERY_REISSUE \
>> >> | UBLK_F_UNPRIVILEGED_DEV \
>> >> | UBLK_F_CMD_IOCTL_ENCODE \
>> >> - | UBLK_F_USER_COPY)
>> >> + | UBLK_F_USER_COPY \
>> >> + | UBLK_F_ZONED)
>> >>
>> >> /* All UBLK_PARAM_TYPE_* should be included here */
>> >> -#define UBLK_PARAM_TYPE_ALL (UBLK_PARAM_TYPE_BASIC | \
>> >> - UBLK_PARAM_TYPE_DISCARD | UBLK_PARAM_TYPE_DEVT)
>> >> +#define UBLK_PARAM_TYPE_ALL \
>> >> + (UBLK_PARAM_TYPE_BASIC | UBLK_PARAM_TYPE_DISCARD | \
>> >> + UBLK_PARAM_TYPE_DEVT | UBLK_PARAM_TYPE_ZONED)
>> >>
>> >> struct ublk_rq_data {
>> >> struct llist_node node;
>> >>
>> >> struct kref ref;
>> >> + __u32 operation;
>> >> + __u64 sector;
>> >> + __u32 nr_sectors;
>> >> };
>> >
>> > Please put "operation" and "nr_sectors" together, then holes
>> > can be avoided.
>>
>> Got it 👍
>>
>> >
>> >>
>> >> struct ublk_uring_cmd_pdu {
>> >> struct ublk_queue *ubq;
>> >> };
>> >>
>> >> +
>> >
>> > ?
>>
>> Sorry.
>>
>> >
>> >> /*
>> >> * io command is active: sqe cmd is received, and its cqe isn't done
>> >> *
>> >> @@ -110,6 +116,11 @@ struct ublk_uring_cmd_pdu {
>> >> */
>> >> #define UBLK_IO_FLAG_NEED_GET_DATA 0x08
>> >>
>> >> +/*
>> >> + * Set when IO is Zone Append
>> >> + */
>> >> +#define UBLK_IO_FLAG_ZONE_APPEND 0x10
>> >> +
>> >> struct ublk_io {
>> >> /* userspace buffer address from io cmd */
>> >> __u64 addr;
>> >> @@ -184,6 +195,31 @@ struct ublk_params_header {
>> >> __u32 len;
>> >> __u32 types;
>> >> };
>> >> +static inline int ublk_dev_params_zoned(const struct ublk_device *ub)
>> >> +{
>> >> + return ub->params.types & UBLK_PARAM_TYPE_ZONED;
>> >> +}
>> >> +
>> >> +static inline bool ublk_dev_is_zoned(const struct ublk_device *ub)
>> >> +{
>> >> + return ub->dev_info.flags & UBLK_F_ZONED;
>> >> +}
>> >> +
>> >> +static int ublk_set_nr_zones(struct ublk_device *ub);
>> >> +static int ublk_dev_param_zoned_validate(const struct ublk_device *ub);
>> >> +static int ublk_dev_param_zoned_apply(struct ublk_device *ub);
>> >> +static int ublk_revalidate_disk_zones(struct ublk_device *ub);
>> >> +
>> >> +#ifndef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_UBLK_ZONED
>> >> +
>> >> +#define ublk_report_zones (NULL)
>> >> +
>> >> +#else
>> >> +
>> >> +static int ublk_report_zones(struct gendisk *disk, sector_t sector,
>> >> + unsigned int nr_zones, report_zones_cb cb, void *data);
>> >> +
>> >> +#endif
>> >
>> > Please merge the following "#ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_UBLK_ZONED" with the
>> > above one, then you can avoid the above declarations. Meantime, we don't
>> > add code after MODULE_LICENSE().
>>
>> Ok 👍
>>
>> >
>> >>
>> >> static inline bool ublk_dev_is_user_copy(const struct ublk_device *ub)
>> >> {
>> >> @@ -232,7 +268,7 @@ static inline unsigned ublk_pos_to_tag(loff_t pos)
>> >> UBLK_TAG_BITS_MASK;
>> >> }
>> >>
>> >> -static void ublk_dev_param_basic_apply(struct ublk_device *ub)
>> >> +static int ublk_dev_param_basic_apply(struct ublk_device *ub)
>> >> {
>> >> struct request_queue *q = ub->ub_disk->queue;
>> >> const struct ublk_param_basic *p = &ub->params.basic;
>> >> @@ -257,6 +293,11 @@ static void ublk_dev_param_basic_apply(struct ublk_device *ub)
>> >> set_disk_ro(ub->ub_disk, true);
>> >>
>> >> set_capacity(ub->ub_disk, p->dev_sectors);
>> >> +
>> >> + if (ublk_dev_is_zoned(ub))
>> >> + return ublk_set_nr_zones(ub);
>> >> +
>> >
>> > The above change can be moved into ublk_dev_param_zoned_apply() which
>> > is always done after ublk_dev_param_basic_apply().
>>
>> Ok
>>
>> >
>> >> + return 0;
>> >> }
>> >>
>> >> static void ublk_dev_param_discard_apply(struct ublk_device *ub)
>> >> @@ -286,6 +327,9 @@ static int ublk_validate_params(const struct ublk_device *ub)
>> >>
>> >> if (p->max_sectors > (ub->dev_info.max_io_buf_bytes >> 9))
>> >> return -EINVAL;
>> >> +
>> >> + if (ublk_dev_is_zoned(ub) && !p->chunk_sectors)
>> >> + return -EINVAL;
>> >> } else
>> >> return -EINVAL;
>> >>
>> >> @@ -304,19 +348,26 @@ static int ublk_validate_params(const struct ublk_device *ub)
>> >> if (ub->params.types & UBLK_PARAM_TYPE_DEVT)
>> >> return -EINVAL;
>> >>
>> >> - return 0;
>> >> + return ublk_dev_param_zoned_validate(ub);
>> >
>> > Please follow current style of:
>> >
>> > if (ub->params.types & UBLK_PARAM_TYPE_ZONED)
>> > return ublk_dev_param_zoned_validate(ub);
>> >
>> > Then you can avoid lots of check on ublk_dev_params_zoned().
>>
>> Ok, but then I need
>>
>>
>> if (ublk_dev_is_zoned(ub) && !ublk_dev_params_zoned(ub))
>> return -EINVAL;
>>
>> here to check if user is forgetting zoned parameters for zoned ublk dev.
>> Or do you want to drop this check?
>
> OK, zoned is a bit special, then you still can do it:
>
> if (ub->params.types & UBLK_PARAM_TYPE_ZONED)
> return ublk_dev_param_zoned_validate(ub);
> else if (ublk_dev_is_zoned(ub))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> which is more readable.
Ok
>
>>
>> >
>> >> }
>> >>
>> >> static int ublk_apply_params(struct ublk_device *ub)
>> >> {
>> >> + int ret;
>> >> +
>> >> if (!(ub->params.types & UBLK_PARAM_TYPE_BASIC))
>> >> return -EINVAL;
>> >>
>> >> - ublk_dev_param_basic_apply(ub);
>> >> + ret = ublk_dev_param_basic_apply(ub);
>> >> + if (ret)
>> >> + return ret;
>> >>
>> >> if (ub->params.types & UBLK_PARAM_TYPE_DISCARD)
>> >> ublk_dev_param_discard_apply(ub);
>> >>
>> >> + if (ublk_dev_params_zoned(ub))
>> >> + return ublk_dev_param_zoned_apply(ub);
>> >> +
>> >> return 0;
>> >> }
>> >>
>> >> @@ -487,6 +538,7 @@ static const struct block_device_operations ub_fops = {
>> >> .owner = THIS_MODULE,
>> >> .open = ublk_open,
>> >> .free_disk = ublk_free_disk,
>> >> + .report_zones = ublk_report_zones,
>> >> };
>> >>
>> >> #define UBLK_MAX_PIN_PAGES 32
>> >> @@ -601,7 +653,8 @@ static inline bool ublk_need_map_req(const struct request *req)
>> >>
>> >> static inline bool ublk_need_unmap_req(const struct request *req)
>> >> {
>> >> - return ublk_rq_has_data(req) && req_op(req) == REQ_OP_READ;
>> >> + return ublk_rq_has_data(req) &&
>> >> + (req_op(req) == REQ_OP_READ || req_op(req) == REQ_OP_DRV_IN);
>> >> }
>> >>
>> >> static int ublk_map_io(const struct ublk_queue *ubq, const struct request *req,
>> >> @@ -685,6 +738,7 @@ static blk_status_t ublk_setup_iod(struct ublk_queue *ubq, struct request *req)
>> >> {
>> >> struct ublksrv_io_desc *iod = ublk_get_iod(ubq, req->tag);
>> >> struct ublk_io *io = &ubq->ios[req->tag];
>> >> + struct ublk_rq_data *pdu = blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(req);
>> >> u32 ublk_op;
>> >>
>> >> switch (req_op(req)) {
>> >> @@ -703,6 +757,37 @@ static blk_status_t ublk_setup_iod(struct ublk_queue *ubq, struct request *req)
>> >> case REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES:
>> >> ublk_op = UBLK_IO_OP_WRITE_ZEROES;
>> >> break;
>> >> + case REQ_OP_ZONE_OPEN:
>> >> + ublk_op = UBLK_IO_OP_ZONE_OPEN;
>> >> + break;
>> >> + case REQ_OP_ZONE_CLOSE:
>> >> + ublk_op = UBLK_IO_OP_ZONE_CLOSE;
>> >> + break;
>> >> + case REQ_OP_ZONE_FINISH:
>> >> + ublk_op = UBLK_IO_OP_ZONE_FINISH;
>> >> + break;
>> >> + case REQ_OP_ZONE_RESET:
>> >> + ublk_op = UBLK_IO_OP_ZONE_RESET;
>> >> + break;
>> >> + case REQ_OP_DRV_IN:
>> >> + ublk_op = pdu->operation;
>> >> + switch (ublk_op) {
>> >> + case UBLK_IO_OP_REPORT_ZONES:
>> >> + iod->op_flags = ublk_op | ublk_req_build_flags(req);
>> >> + iod->nr_sectors = pdu->nr_sectors;
>> >> + iod->start_sector = pdu->sector;
>> >> + return BLK_STS_OK;
>> >> + default:
>> >> + return BLK_STS_IOERR;
>> >> + }
>> >> + case REQ_OP_ZONE_APPEND:
>> >> + ublk_op = UBLK_IO_OP_ZONE_APPEND;
>> >> + io->flags |= UBLK_IO_FLAG_ZONE_APPEND;
>> >> + break;
>> >> + case REQ_OP_ZONE_RESET_ALL:
>> >
>> > BLK_STS_NOTSUPP should be returned, since in future we may support it,
>> > and userspace need to know what is wrong.
>>
>> Ok
>>
>> >
>> >> + case REQ_OP_DRV_OUT:
>> >> + /* We do not support reset_all and drv_out */
>> >> + fallthrough;
>> >> default:
>> >> return BLK_STS_IOERR;
>> >> }
>> >> @@ -756,7 +841,8 @@ static inline void __ublk_complete_rq(struct request *req)
>> >> *
>> >> * Both the two needn't unmap.
>> >> */
>> >> - if (req_op(req) != REQ_OP_READ && req_op(req) != REQ_OP_WRITE)
>> >> + if (req_op(req) != REQ_OP_READ && req_op(req) != REQ_OP_WRITE &&
>> >> + req_op(req) != REQ_OP_DRV_IN)
>> >> goto exit;
>> >>
>> >> /* for READ request, writing data in iod->addr to rq buffers */
>> >> @@ -1120,6 +1206,11 @@ static void ublk_commit_completion(struct ublk_device *ub,
>> >> /* find the io request and complete */
>> >> req = blk_mq_tag_to_rq(ub->tag_set.tags[qid], tag);
>> >>
>> >> + if (io->flags & UBLK_IO_FLAG_ZONE_APPEND) {
>> >> + req->__sector = ub_cmd->addr;
>> >> + io->flags &= ~UBLK_IO_FLAG_ZONE_APPEND;
>> >> + }
>> >> +
>> >> if (req && likely(!blk_should_fake_timeout(req->q)))
>> >> ublk_put_req_ref(ubq, req);
>> >> }
>> >> @@ -1419,7 +1510,8 @@ static int __ublk_ch_uring_cmd(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
>> >> ^ (_IOC_NR(cmd_op) == UBLK_IO_NEED_GET_DATA))
>> >> goto out;
>> >>
>> >> - if (ublk_support_user_copy(ubq) && ub_cmd->addr) {
>> >> + if (ublk_support_user_copy(ubq) &&
>> >> + !(io->flags & UBLK_IO_FLAG_ZONE_APPEND) && ub_cmd->addr) {
>> >> ret = -EINVAL;
>> >> goto out;
>> >> }
>> >> @@ -1542,11 +1634,14 @@ static inline bool ublk_check_ubuf_dir(const struct request *req,
>> >> int ubuf_dir)
>> >> {
>> >> /* copy ubuf to request pages */
>> >> - if (req_op(req) == REQ_OP_READ && ubuf_dir == ITER_SOURCE)
>> >> + if ((req_op(req) == REQ_OP_READ || req_op(req) == REQ_OP_DRV_IN) &&
>> >> + ubuf_dir == ITER_SOURCE)
>> >> return true;
>> >>
>> >> /* copy request pages to ubuf */
>> >> - if (req_op(req) == REQ_OP_WRITE && ubuf_dir == ITER_DEST)
>> >> + if ((req_op(req) == REQ_OP_WRITE ||
>> >> + req_op(req) == REQ_OP_ZONE_APPEND) &&
>> >> + ubuf_dir == ITER_DEST)
>> >> return true;
>> >>
>> >> return false;
>> >> @@ -1883,8 +1978,12 @@ static int ublk_ctrl_start_dev(struct ublk_device *ub, struct io_uring_cmd *cmd)
>> >> if (ub->nr_privileged_daemon != ub->nr_queues_ready)
>> >> set_bit(GD_SUPPRESS_PART_SCAN, &disk->state);
>> >>
>> >> - get_device(&ub->cdev_dev);
>> >> ub->dev_info.state = UBLK_S_DEV_LIVE;
>> >> + ret = ublk_revalidate_disk_zones(ub);
>> >> + if (ret)
>> >> + goto out_put_disk;
>> >> +
>> >> + get_device(&ub->cdev_dev);
>> >> ret = add_disk(disk);
>> >> if (ret) {
>> >> /*
>> >> @@ -2045,6 +2144,13 @@ static int ublk_ctrl_add_dev(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd)
>> >> if (ublk_dev_is_user_copy(ub))
>> >> ub->dev_info.flags &= ~UBLK_F_NEED_GET_DATA;
>> >>
>> >> + /* Zoned storage support requires user copy feature */
>> >> + if (ublk_dev_is_zoned(ub) &&
>> >> + (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_UBLK_ZONED) || !ublk_dev_is_user_copy(ub))) {
>> >> + ret = -EINVAL;
>> >> + goto out_free_dev_number;
>> >> + }
>> >> +
>> >> /* We are not ready to support zero copy */
>> >> ub->dev_info.flags &= ~UBLK_F_SUPPORT_ZERO_COPY;
>> >>
>> >> @@ -2629,3 +2735,214 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(ublks_max, "max number of ublk devices allowed to add(default:
>> >>
>> >> MODULE_AUTHOR("Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>");
>> >> MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>> >> +
>> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_UBLK_ZONED
>> >> +
>> >> +static int get_nr_zones(const struct ublk_device *ub)
>> >> +{
>> >> + const struct ublk_param_basic *p = &ub->params.basic;
>> >> +
>> >> + if (!p->chunk_sectors)
>> >> + return 0;
>> >
>> > There isn't zoned device if the above check fails, so no
>> > need to check it.
>>
>> Ok, but this is called from `ublk_dev_param_zoned_validate()` to
>> validate user sets params correct. Should we not report error to user
>> space during parameter validation if user space sets chunk_sectors to
>> zero for zoned device?
>
> That has been covered in UBLK_PARAM_TYPE_BASIC branch of ublk_validate_params().
Right 👍
>
>>
>> >
>> >> +
>> >> + /* Zone size is a power of 2 */
>> >> + return p->dev_sectors >> ilog2(p->chunk_sectors);
>> >> +}
>> >> +
>> >> +static int ublk_set_nr_zones(struct ublk_device *ub)
>> >> +{
>> >> + ub->ub_disk->nr_zones = get_nr_zones(ub);
>> >> + if (!ub->ub_disk->nr_zones)
>> >> + return -EINVAL;
>> >
>> > Is nr_zones one must for zoned?
>>
>> Zero zones for a zoned storage device is not allowed, as far as I am
>> aware. Am I mistaken?
>
> OK, never mind, I just didn't see such check in null zoned and virtio-blk.
>
>>
>> >
>> >> +
>> >> + return 0;
>> >> +}
>> >> +
>> >> +static int ublk_revalidate_disk_zones(struct ublk_device *ub)
>> >> +{
>> >> + if (ublk_dev_is_zoned(ub))
>> >> + return blk_revalidate_disk_zones(ub->ub_disk, NULL);
>> >> +
>> >> + return 0;
>> >> +}
>> >> +
>> >> +static int ublk_dev_param_zoned_validate(const struct ublk_device *ub)
>> >> +{
>> >> + const struct ublk_param_zoned *p = &ub->params.zoned;
>> >> + int nr_zones;
>> >> +
>> >> + if (ublk_dev_is_zoned(ub) && !ublk_dev_params_zoned(ub))
>> >> + return -EINVAL;
>> >> +
>> >> + if (!ublk_dev_is_zoned(ub) && ublk_dev_params_zoned(ub))
>> >> + return -EINVAL;
>> >> +
>> >> + if (!ublk_dev_params_zoned(ub))
>> >> + return 0;
>> >
>> > The above can be simplified as single check if we follow current
>> > validate/apply code style:
>> >
>> > if (!ublk_dev_is_zoned(ub))
>> > return -EINVAL;
>>
>> If we do that we will not be able to check if user space sets the
>> `UBLK_F_ZONED` flag without setting zoned parameters. Should I validate
>> that at call site or drop the check?
>
> Please see above comment, which can be covered as:
>
> if (ub->params.types & UBLK_PARAM_TYPE_ZONED)
> return ublk_dev_param_zoned_validate(ub);
> else if (ublk_dev_is_zoned(ub))
> return -EINVAL;
>
>>
>> >> +
>> >> + if (!p->max_zone_append_sectors)
>> >> + return -EINVAL;
>> >> +
>> >> + nr_zones = get_nr_zones(ub);
>> >> +
>> >> + if (p->max_active_zones > nr_zones)
>> >> + return -EINVAL;
>> >> +
>> >> + if (p->max_open_zones > nr_zones)
>> >> + return -EINVAL;
>> >> +
>> >> + return 0;
>> >> +}
>> >> +
>> >> +static int ublk_dev_param_zoned_apply(struct ublk_device *ub)
>> >> +{
>> >> + const struct ublk_param_zoned *p = &ub->params.zoned;
>> >> +
>> >> + disk_set_zoned(ub->ub_disk, BLK_ZONED_HM);
>> >> + blk_queue_required_elevator_features(ub->ub_disk->queue,
>> >> + ELEVATOR_F_ZBD_SEQ_WRITE);
>> >> + disk_set_max_active_zones(ub->ub_disk, p->max_active_zones);
>> >> + disk_set_max_open_zones(ub->ub_disk, p->max_open_zones);
>> >> + blk_queue_max_zone_append_sectors(ub->ub_disk->queue, p->max_zone_append_sectors);
>> >> +
>> >> + return 0;
>> >> +}
>> >> +
>> >> +/* Based on virtblk_alloc_report_buffer */
>> >> +static void *ublk_alloc_report_buffer(struct ublk_device *ublk,
>> >> + unsigned int nr_zones, size_t *buflen)
>> >> +{
>> >> + struct request_queue *q = ublk->ub_disk->queue;
>> >> + size_t bufsize;
>> >> + void *buf;
>> >> +
>> >> + nr_zones = min_t(unsigned int, nr_zones,
>> >> + ublk->ub_disk->nr_zones);
>> >> +
>> >> + bufsize = nr_zones * sizeof(struct blk_zone);
>> >> + bufsize =
>> >> + min_t(size_t, bufsize, queue_max_hw_sectors(q) << SECTOR_SHIFT);
>> >> + bufsize = min_t(size_t, bufsize, queue_max_segments(q) << PAGE_SHIFT);
>> >> +
>> >> + while (bufsize >= sizeof(struct blk_zone)) {
>> >> + buf = __vmalloc(bufsize, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NORETRY);
>> >> + if (buf) {
>> >> + *buflen = bufsize;
>> >> + return buf;
>> >> + }
>> >> + bufsize >>= 1;
>> >> + }
>> >> +
>> >> + *buflen = 0;
>> >> + return NULL;
>> >> +}
>> >> +
>> >> +static int ublk_report_zones(struct gendisk *disk, sector_t sector,
>> >> + unsigned int nr_zones, report_zones_cb cb, void *data)
>> >> +{
>> >> + struct ublk_device *ub = disk->private_data;
>> >> + unsigned int zone_size_sectors = disk->queue->limits.chunk_sectors;
>> >> + unsigned int first_zone = sector >> ilog2(zone_size_sectors);
>> >> + unsigned int done_zones = 0;
>> >> + unsigned int max_zones_per_request;
>> >> + int ret;
>> >> + struct blk_zone *buffer;
>> >> + size_t buffer_length;
>> >> +
>> >> + if (!ublk_dev_is_zoned(ub))
>> >> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> >> +
>> >> + nr_zones = min_t(unsigned int, ub->ub_disk->nr_zones - first_zone,
>> >> + nr_zones);
>> >> +
>> >> + buffer = ublk_alloc_report_buffer(ub, nr_zones, &buffer_length);
>> >> + if (!buffer)
>> >> + return -ENOMEM;
>> >> +
>> >> + max_zones_per_request = buffer_length / sizeof(struct blk_zone);
>> >> +
>> >> + while (done_zones < nr_zones) {
>> >> + unsigned int remaining_zones = nr_zones - done_zones;
>> >> + unsigned int zones_in_request =
>> >> + min_t(unsigned int, remaining_zones, max_zones_per_request);
>> >> + struct request *req;
>> >> + struct ublk_rq_data *pdu;
>> >> + blk_status_t status;
>> >> +
>> >> + memset(buffer, 0, buffer_length);
>> >> +
>> >> + req = blk_mq_alloc_request(disk->queue, REQ_OP_DRV_IN, 0);
>> >> + if (IS_ERR(req)) {
>> >> + ret = PTR_ERR(req);
>> >> + goto out;
>> >> + }
>> >> +
>> >> + pdu = blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(req);
>> >> + pdu->operation = UBLK_IO_OP_REPORT_ZONES;
>> >> + pdu->sector = sector;
>> >> + pdu->nr_sectors = remaining_zones * zone_size_sectors;
>> >> +
>> >> + ret = blk_rq_map_kern(disk->queue, req, buffer, buffer_length,
>> >> + GFP_KERNEL);
>> >> + if (ret) {
>> >> + blk_mq_free_request(req);
>> >> + goto out;
>> >> + }
>> >> +
>> >> + status = blk_execute_rq(req, 0);
>> >> + ret = blk_status_to_errno(status);
>> >> + blk_mq_free_request(req);
>> >> + if (ret)
>> >> + goto out;
>> >> +
>> >> + for (unsigned int i = 0; i < zones_in_request; i++) {
>> >> + struct blk_zone *zone = buffer + i;
>> >> +
>> >> + /* A zero length zone means no more zones in this response */
>> >> + if (!zone->len)
>> >> + break;
>> >> +
>> >> + ret = cb(zone, i, data);
>> >> + if (ret)
>> >> + goto out;
>> >> +
>> >> + done_zones++;
>> >> + sector += zone_size_sectors;
>> >> +
>> >> + }
>> >> + }
>> >> +
>> >> + ret = done_zones;
>> >> +
>> >> +out:
>> >> + kvfree(buffer);
>> >> + return ret;
>> >> +}
>> >> +
>> >> +#else
>> >> +
>> >> +static int ublk_set_nr_zones(struct ublk_device *ub)
>> >> +{
>> >> + return 0;
>> >> +}
>> >> +
>> >> +static int ublk_dev_param_zoned_validate(const struct ublk_device *ub)
>> >> +{
>> >> + if (ublk_dev_params_zoned(ub))
>> >> + return -EINVAL;
>> >> + return 0;
>> >
>> > Please move the check outside by following current code style, then:
>> >
>> > return -EINVAL;
>> >
>>
>> Ok, but then we move the check for user applying zoned params to
>> non-zoned device when CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ZONED to call site?
>
> Yes, the point is to move check in common code, then not only reduce
> repeated check, but also cleaner.
>
Ok, thanks
BR Andreas