Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the block tree
From: Song Liu
Date: Tue Aug 15 2023 - 12:27:41 EST
On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 12:20 AM Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 8/15/23 10:17 AM, Song Liu wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 12:07?AM Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 8/15/23 9:58 AM, Song Liu wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 11:08?PM Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> On 8/14/23 9:21 PM, Yu Kuai wrote:
> >>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ? 2023/08/15 7:19, Stephen Rothwell ??:
> >>>>>> Hi all,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> In commit
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 71070e7bd25d ("md/raid10: fix a 'conf->barrier' leakage in raid10_takeover()")
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Fixes tag
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Fixes: 4d27e927344a ("md: don't quiesce in mddev_suspend()")
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> has these problem(s):
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> - Target SHA1 does not exist
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Sorry about this, the commit was picked from previous md-next branch,
> >>>>> and I didn't know that it will change...
> >>>>
> >>>> It's most likely not your fault, I'm guessing Song rebased that branch
> >>>> and this is why the sha changed. Song?
> >>>
> >>> Yeah, it is my fault. I am really sorry for this issue.
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> Is there any way that I can fix this ?
> >>>>
> >>>> Only way to fix this is if I rewind my branch and Song updates his
> >>>> branch to not have this issue, and then sends a new pull request.
> >>>
> >>> Yes please. Let's fix this.
> >>
> >> Please send a new one, I've dropped the old one.
> >
> > Is this the for-6.6/block branch? I haven't seen the change yet. The top
> > commit on the branch (as I see) is
> >
> > 306d74055754 ("ublk: Switch to memdup_user_nul() helper")
>
> Where are you looking? It's at:
I am looking at
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git
It appears to be some lag from git server?
Thanks,
Song
>
> commit 66a6a5d0ec852eaced589da066376e69397cd71e (origin/for-6.6/block, for-6.6/block)
> Author: Ruan Jinjie <ruanjinjie@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tue Aug 15 19:48:14 2023 +0800
>
> ublk: Switch to memdup_user_nul() helper
>
> since about 15 min ago.