Re: [PATCH] drm/nouveau/gsp: Fix possible NULL pointer dereference warning in r535_dmac_alloc
From: Danilo Krummrich
Date: Sat Apr 18 2026 - 16:43:22 EST
On 4/18/26 7:44 PM, Timur Tabi wrote:
> On Sat, 2026-04-18 at 19:35 +0200, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
>>> I posted a patch a couple months ago that cleans up an IS_ERR check, but it was never picked
>>> up:
>>
>> Thanks! Can you please make sure to send patches to all maintainers? If they
>> don't land in my inbox, I can't pick them up. :(
>
> M: Lyude Paul <lyude@xxxxxxxxxx>
> M: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Hmmmm.... I did CC Lyude, but you're right. I should update my git-email script to catch these
> better.
>
> While I have your attention, I do have other patches that I neglected to CC you on:
>
> 2. [PATCH 6/6] drm/nouveau/gsp: enable FWSEC-SB on GA100
> - by Timur Tabi @ 2026-04-07 19:21 UTC [95%]
>
> 3. [PATCH 2/6] drm/nouveau/bios: specify correct display fuse register for Ampere and Ada
> - by Timur Tabi @ 2026-04-07 19:21 UTC [95%]
>
> 4. [PATCH 1/6] drm/nouveau: check for GA100 specifically when calculating FRTS size
> - by Timur Tabi @ 2026-04-07 19:21 UTC [91%]
>
> 5. [PATCH 4/6] drm/nouveau/gsp: require GSP-RM for GA100 support
> - by Timur Tabi @ 2026-04-07 19:21 UTC [97%]
>
> 6. [PATCH 3/6] drm/nouveau/bios: skip the IFR header if present
> - by Timur Tabi @ 2026-04-07 19:21 UTC [75%]
>
> 7. [PATCH 5/6] drm/nouveau: parse the VBIOS on GA100
> - by Timur Tabi @ 2026-04-07 19:21 UTC [99%]
>
> 8. [PATCH 0/6] drm/nouveau: fix GA100 issues
> - by Timur Tabi @ 2026-04-07 19:21 UTC [93%]
>
> 9. [PATCH] drm/nouveau: expose VBIOS via debugfs on GSP-RM systems
> - by Timur Tabi @ 2026-04-07 18:53 UTC [95%]
Ok, I will take a look in the next days.
Thanks,
Danilo
>>> https://lore.freedesktop.org/nouveau/20260103000756.1002890-1-ttabi@xxxxxxxxxx/T/#u
>>>
>>> I'm quite certain that there are other similar issues in Nouveau w.r.t. IS_ERR_OR_NULL.
>>
>> Yeah, that sounds likely.
>>
>>> I think an audit of the Nouveau error paths is in order. I suspect that Ben's big refactors
>>> over the past year have resulted in some invalid error paths.
>>
>> Are you planning to look into this?
>
> No, but it does sound like something that Claude could figure out pretty quick.