Re: [PATCH 00/13] docs/zh_TW: process: add translations of 13 documents

[Weijie Yuan]

Dongliang Mu <dzm91@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On 11/7/26 8:44 PM, Dongliang Mu wrote:
> > 
> > On 11/6/26 7:35 PM, Chen-Yu Yeh wrote:
> > > I previously promised Jon that if no contributors stepped forward
> > > within two months, the maintainers would have to produce some results
> > > ourselves.
> > > 
> > > This series adds zh_TW translations for 13 process/ documents that had
> > > no Traditional Chinese version, and moves each one from the TODOList
> > > into the toctree of process/index.rst.
> 
> Hi Weijie and Chen-Yu,
> 
> I´m also working on updating the zh_CN translations. My plan is to first
> resolve all references using |:ref:| tags or direct document paths.

Very much appreciated to hear that!

> I´ll proceed as follows:
> 
> 1. Update references directly for content already translated and merged
>    into the tree.

Definitely agreed.

> 2. Add missing translations where referenced content has none, then
>    update the corresponding references.

Yup, for zh_CN I 100% support, because its current coverage area is
already quite extensive. And it's as exciting as adding the final piece
to a jigsaw puzzle.

But for zh_TW, The current coverage rate is low, compared with zh_CN.
Therefore I'm worried that extending to multiple directories in an
impractical attempt to achieve self-reference might lead to subsequent
maintenance problems, just like the situation before Chen-Yu took over.

(However, we need to confirm which directory contains the referenced
English files we intend to expand. If after careful consideration, we
decide to include them, of course we can do so.)

So, just like my previous reply to Chen-Yu, I suggest that we first
complete the existing goals, and then carefully consider and discuss the
issue of expansion.

> After the current translation are self-referenced, I will continue to add
> more translation. In the current stage, it would be more important to fix
> all severe issues in the translation other than adding more translation. To
> be honest, it is easier to leverage LLM to add more translation.

Yes.

> This is just my approach for enriching the zh_CN translation work - I´m not
> suggesting you need to follow it.

Very much appreciated, thanks for your suggestion!