Re: [RFC PATCH 00/34] sun8i-codec fixes and new features

From: Maxime Ripard
Date: Mon Feb 17 2020 - 04:14:30 EST


On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 12:42:16AM -0600, Samuel Holland wrote:
> The sun8i-codec driver, as used in the Allwinner A33 and A64, currently
> only exposes a small subset of the available hardware features. In order
> to use the A64 in a smartphone (the PinePhone), I've added the necessary
> functionality to the driver:
> * The full set of supported DAI format options
> * Support for AIF2 and AIF3
> * Additional routing knobs
> * Additional volume controls
> Unfortunately, due to preexisting issues with the driver, there are some
> breaking changes, as explained further in the commit messages:
> * The LRCK inversion issue means we need a new compatible for the A64.
> * Some controls are named inaccurately, so they are renamed.
> * Likewise, the DAPM widgets used in device trees were either named
> wrong, or the device trees were using the wrong widgets in the first
> place. (Specifically, the links between the analog codec and digital
> codec happen at the ADC and DAC, not AIF1.)
> I tended to take the philosophy of "while I'm breaking things, I might
> as well do them right", so I've probably made a few more changes than
> absolutely necessary. I'm not sure about where all of the policy
> boundaries are, about how far I should go to maintain compatibility. For
> example, for the DT widget usage, I could:
> * Rename everything and update the DTS files (which is what I did)
> * Keep the old (misleading/wrong) name for the widgets, but repurpose
> them to work correctly
> (i.e. "ADC Left" would be named "AIF1 Slot 0 Left ADC", but it
> would work just like "ADC Left" does in this patchset)
> * Keep the old widgets around as a compatibility layer, but add new
> widgets and update the in-tree DTS files to use them
> (i.e. "ADC Left" would have a path from "AIF1 Slot 0 Left ADC",
> but "AIF1 Slot 0 Left ADC" would be a no-op widget)
> * Something else entirely

I'm not sure this is really a concern here. We need to maintain the
compatibility with old DT's, but those will have an A33 compatible
too, and as far as I can see, you're not changing anything for that
compatible, so we're in the clear?

If not, then the third option would probably be the best, especially
since it's only a couple of them.